[
  {
    "rank": 1,
    "venue": "Kalshi (CFTC DCM)",
    "strategy": "Selective passive market making in mid-liquidity, fee-light series; quote-pulling around scheduled events; inventory skew; incentive programs (LIP/DLP) as upside only",
    "edgeSource": "Uninformed and favorite-longshot-biased takers pay the spread (Burgi-Deng-Whelan: takers ~-32% vs makers ~-10% avg); adverse selection concentrated around predictable events and avoidable",
    "netReturnRange5k": "-15% to +30% annualized (estimate)",
    "netReturnRange50k": "-10% to +20% annualized (estimate)",
    "capacityUsd": "100000-300000 per operator (estimate)",
    "competition": "Medium: professional DLPs in top series, thin in long tail",
    "techBar": "Moderate: seconds-level latency OK outside events; 99.9% uptime with cancel-on-disconnect; L2 recorder; event calendar and reference-price feeds",
    "tailRisks": "Incentive program cuts (Volume program ended Oct 2026), resolution ambiguity, correlated event jumps, regulatory action on event contracts, bot malfunction",
    "usAccess": "Yes: US-regulated, KYC, ACH funding",
    "backtestability": "Medium: public trades and metadata; L2 history likely must be self-recorded; queue-position modelling required",
    "defensibility": "Moderate at small size (execution, event discipline, data), weak at scale vs pro DLPs",
    "confidence": "Medium-low"
  },
  {
    "rank": 2,
    "venue": "Polymarket US (CFTC DCM via FCM) + Kalshi",
    "strategy": "Cross-venue relative value: maker-first quoting on the stale venue using the other venue's mid as reference, fee-aware taker hedge; human-reviewed contract-equivalence map",
    "edgeSource": "Price dislocations between two retail pools with different user bases, fees and resolution sources; takers on the stale side pay",
    "netReturnRange5k": "-10% to +25% annualized (estimate)",
    "netReturnRange50k": "-5% to +15% annualized (estimate)",
    "capacityUsd": "50000-200000 (estimate; limited by overlapping pairs and capital lock to resolution)",
    "competition": "Medium-high: many scanners on same pairs",
    "techBar": "Moderate-high: synchronized feeds on two venues, sub-5s hedge, two KYC accounts, capital split",
    "tailRisks": "Resolution-criteria mismatch losing both legs, hedge failure, Polymarket US API/fee changes, capital lock, regulatory",
    "usAccess": "Yes (both regulated); Polymarket US API, fees and maker programs unverified",
    "backtestability": "Low-medium: requires forward-recorded synchronized order books; settlement divergence history sparse",
    "defensibility": "Moderate: contract-mapping quality and hedge logic, not secret",
    "confidence": "Low"
  },
  {
    "rank": 3,
    "venue": "US-regulated crypto futures (Coinbase Derivatives nano perpetual-style futures / CME) vs spot or ETF",
    "strategy": "Regime-switched funding/basis carry; hold T-bills when funding below threshold (benchmark and capital parking, not an edge)",
    "edgeSource": "Leveraged longs pay funding/basis; trailing-12m BTC ~5.2%, ETH ~4.1% annualized to May 2026 (secondary source)",
    "netReturnRange5k": "0% to +6% annualized (estimate; contract granularity and fees bite)",
    "netReturnRange50k": "+2% to +7% annualized (estimate)",
    "capacityUsd": "Very large (>1,000,000)",
    "competition": "High (largely arbitraged), but low technical bar",
    "techBar": "Low: daily rebalancing, margin monitoring",
    "tailRisks": "Funding flips negative, margin calls in spikes, hedge basis between ETF and futures, broker/FCM risk",
    "usAccess": "Yes: CFTC-regulated via FCM/broker",
    "backtestability": "High for CME basis and spot; medium for Coinbase perp-style funding history (archive availability unverified)",
    "defensibility": "None (regime bet)",
    "confidence": "Medium"
  },
  {
    "rank": 4,
    "venue": "Polymarket international CLOB",
    "strategy": "Market making with liquidity rewards + maker rebates (+ holding rewards)",
    "edgeSource": "Treasury and taker-fee-funded rewards (15-25% of taker fees rebated to makers; sampled-book liquidity rewards) plus spread",
    "netReturnRange5k": "-10% to +40% annualized if accessible (estimate)",
    "netReturnRange50k": "-5% to +25% annualized if accessible (estimate)",
    "capacityUsd": "Small per market; reward pools shared and compete down",
    "competition": "High in rewarded markets",
    "techBar": "Moderate",
    "tailRisks": "Reward cuts, UMA resolution disputes, account/legal risk for US persons",
    "usAccess": "No: international platform not for US persons; rejected on compliance",
    "backtestability": "Medium: public trades, reward terms documented; L2 history self-recorded",
    "defensibility": "Low-moderate",
    "confidence": "Low"
  },
  {
    "rank": 5,
    "venue": "Hyperliquid",
    "strategy": "Perp market making / funding capture / HLP or vault deposits",
    "edgeSource": "Spread and rebates (rebates only above 0.5% maker-volume share), funding, HLP liquidation and MM profits",
    "netReturnRange5k": "Negative to low for MM at base 0.015% maker fee (estimate)",
    "netReturnRange50k": "Negative to low for MM (estimate)",
    "capacityUsd": "Large",
    "competition": "Very high (professional HFT)",
    "techBar": "High: low latency, high volume to reach rebate tiers",
    "tailRisks": "Liquidation cascades, oracle/market manipulation incidents, validator/bridge risk",
    "usAccess": "No: interface terms exclude US persons; rejected",
    "backtestability": "High (public L2/trade data)",
    "defensibility": "Low for small operator",
    "confidence": "Medium"
  },
  {
    "rank": 6,
    "venue": "Lighter / Aster / Drift and other perp DEXs",
    "strategy": "Market making or points/airdrop farming",
    "edgeSource": "Zero-fee venues and token incentives (speculative)",
    "netReturnRange5k": "Unknown / speculative",
    "netReturnRange50k": "Unknown / speculative",
    "capacityUsd": "Unknown",
    "competition": "High",
    "techBar": "High",
    "tailRisks": "Protocol exploits (Drift ~$285M, Apr 2026), incentive dependence, volume decay",
    "usAccess": "Not established; rejected",
    "backtestability": "Low for airdrop value",
    "defensibility": "Low",
    "confidence": "Low"
  },
  {
    "rank": 7,
    "venue": "Papertrade.xyz (HyperEVM)",
    "strategy": "Trading vs house pool, or staking PAPER for dividends",
    "edgeSource": "Losers fund pool; stakers receive surplus. Trader EV negative by construction; only structural edge is mid-price manipulation (excluded)",
    "netReturnRange5k": "Negative for traders (estimate); staking requires prior losses to mint PAPER",
    "netReturnRange50k": "Negative for traders (estimate)",
    "capacityUsd": "Pool capped ~5,000,000",
    "competition": "Crowded",
    "techBar": "Low",
    "tailRisks": "Mid-price oracle manipulation ($1.28M launch-day incident), payout queue, 2-of-3 admin multisig, no public audit, PAPER dilution, bucket-shop/gambling classification",
    "usAccess": "Unknown; likely legally problematic for US person; rejected",
    "backtestability": "Low",
    "defensibility": "None",
    "confidence": "Medium"
  },
  {
    "rank": 8,
    "venue": "Prediction markets (Kalshi/Polymarket)",
    "strategy": "News / resolution-speed trading (sniping stale quotes)",
    "edgeSource": "Slow makers' stale quotes",
    "netReturnRange5k": "-30% to +100% (highly skewed estimate)",
    "netReturnRange50k": "Capacity-limited",
    "capacityUsd": "Tiny per event",
    "competition": "Very high (latency race)",
    "techBar": "Very high",
    "tailRisks": "Venue fee changes targeting latency arb, wrong-way news, speed losses",
    "usAccess": "Yes on Kalshi",
    "backtestability": "Low (requires timestamped news + book)",
    "defensibility": "Near zero for a non-colocated single VM",
    "confidence": "Medium"
  },
  {
    "rank": 9,
    "venue": "On-chain DEXs (Uniswap-style AMMs, CEX-DEX)",
    "strategy": "Concentrated LP / MEV-style arbitrage",
    "edgeSource": "Swap fees minus LVR; ordering rents",
    "netReturnRange5k": "Around zero or negative for passive LP (estimate)",
    "netReturnRange50k": "Around zero or negative (estimate)",
    "capacityUsd": "Large for LP, concentrated for MEV",
    "competition": "Very high (integrated searcher-builders)",
    "techBar": "Very high for MEV",
    "tailRisks": "LVR, smart-contract risk, JIT liquidity, legal grey areas",
    "usAccess": "Technically accessible; MEV legal grey area",
    "backtestability": "High for LP",
    "defensibility": "Low",
    "confidence": "Medium"
  }
]
