{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"0ffe079d-a62f-4510-b182-548f8f67f7b2","kind":"goal","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"acf26dac8ad1705c3b1f4580342091a6fbae1c177dcb6a396d7f6d981717db2e","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0001","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"912dbf0c628a1a668f5ea7302d7ca4eef90b989fac07372be1f8b2d2292e65b2","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0002","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"ef988a75190f1f42cf17fdff05ff0c94e8f0ebc1bd574f34e54fe2c782756b22","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0003","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"6dd912f05dd5fae0bad49c49d357ca1a5b16b3f7b0d3c9412831a820494c9780","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0004","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"8234b07a859997423af4ba49231e4ec0c2de082ee0f50adb93d3d279c34f3e03","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0005","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"ce6e3271dc0c0a6a505bbcae6bc384020e4bf083569fd9be23c8c2deb481d4d7","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0006","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"1b8498b68b630b77d96d14d5cde496e03e88419bbff166429b74c2a8194dac0c","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0007","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"ff95fd3e1cee3cd55499720608404dda3e84620ecdd74ffd3d89c3d4e38c7924","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0008","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"2bcb4e21c84af87f5cb1d270279fa63a3ff34483fba5a63663ede1e334dfda25","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0009","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"eff3c572dc48a6234960e7c2b0501617518f048a9ef3b320d8cabec56bf806bb","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0010","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"03e1ff6d7812fa0c3281ac17bf609677b907436ea7785308a4bd6b9eca7f254b","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0011","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"cc7126de545e9381f8e6d82b43b43e8ffc43aa5909a9a104ab36dace9c0c2516","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0012","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"e3a20d14fe2dd44f91b94942806a8ca59100702d883f5d13aa07e011d6fdeec8","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0013","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"0dc55eab0db2edd9984735ac07e764eb280dfd788fb0cb992a56ab00254715e1","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0014","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"b84ec131fb1e2267ff73682af407821cc3a81835bf2615eb9fc38e0b2fdd045c","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0015","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"629a387d1b21630183eeb051a56117c849e3371a9072136d1103b5b4325384c1","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0016","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"b8d21cf3e873123e09e4669749b870890d00c7df575a79c5d6a5dbb30b343674","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0017","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"8c748ceb9e05ee55ddc2ce20a242f56277d73cc1e3f12c40ad652144cc2bf55c","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0018","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"71bf617e25622340461cf31263d1df68dca583ab17bdbd3e9386f2b5d15f4dae","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0019","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"1f474d01744edea1b5fd5bfb456dac3471f23b53574ba2bfa6722b2fd16dc4d8","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0020","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"a7cec0275d457b128b2d0c5f154be4c718d97290e47e1e1a0d07143262371724","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0021","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"42bf0c1f7600e8dab721cfe48dbef481c119ab62aba5ec3408062bacb3be84fd","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0022","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"a5195d2169a82af45ac112270a13b2e50d6c91db6dcd2ab65d3462a3ec377f9e","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0023","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"d8d5b64053bdc8c06dc9d9f55b4acf72cc270e3dcab5693aae2f1ed460d23f8e","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0024","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"0cb7c163c46aa207027b0988797b127c2c56b1887bb197c13d8d103a3c265e28","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0025","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"e2cf2ee3f69f6a01836f061d213173a44404c22e772230ba9606e42a842f5c77","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0026","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"b4b1cb156f00191fc7f2f7c96c1fda4e93f478fe2add61523315bb01e8adc9f0","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0027","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"5363ce985ded2f3ae125638b593798b7be61027d8c219f87836fe183c194d5eb","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0028","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"ff4c41a5915f69d5ea615473eae831dfdedcbcf446e76cd875b7d7fc6650c9b2","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0029","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"c9e4c04a23141185bcb7b61f45f66f558e5d421e6021196107e4c5dc0db5799a","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"item_0030","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"5e71970ed7f7236eb8743a7a69ba71d1865b2582c633a75cca71935a90e134f0","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"merge_01","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"6b7d91a4c4a1cc98f11cdeb37c075ad4d2ea9f64020af94400171d2ded126920","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"merge_02","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"0c3f7229d6dcbb26fdaeb941c7ce6f747a3da53d2fba1be766638c5a0e872c24","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network","worker:0.1.5"],"skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","subagents":4,"tools":[]},"key":"writeup","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"9c770b1f49f7eca293eca636b99ce55e2ad9c939f6e64f7673cafe23e7ba8ecb","skillId":"goal-task","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"A checklist for IMD's contract builds and token launches, drawn from 30 public DeFi exploits of 2025 and 2026: for each, what failed, the general pattern behind it, and the check that would have caught it before deployment.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"e391229a119c4d4edf586051b47744dc359253c72dee9fed51904a576a0f7ab0","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"0ffe079d-a62f-4510-b182-548f8f67f7b2","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":null},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"52585","feedbackHash":"f564cdf9f2c2b08f326eef4aa2aa06de7bc8f78ceb5023f25d073fa5d48d2c60","nodeKey":"item_0001","submissionHash":"acf26dac8ad1705c3b1f4580342091a6fbae1c177dcb6a396d7f6d981717db2e","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51073","feedbackHash":"e369483f8fc70b0989430d00fd6410f21fe17c7ec3b5d934da784e3947192af5","nodeKey":"item_0002","submissionHash":"912dbf0c628a1a668f5ea7302d7ca4eef90b989fac07372be1f8b2d2292e65b2","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52198","feedbackHash":"3ff687d38b8f351710031fb40440b21a3093e11ebc22a99a813554447adba3d2","nodeKey":"item_0003","submissionHash":"ef988a75190f1f42cf17fdff05ff0c94e8f0ebc1bd574f34e54fe2c782756b22","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51366","feedbackHash":"02494d45ed17a8f34b657a5561d4ef0fe1ef369634c4d0e4c37c2f7537fc72d8","nodeKey":"item_0004","submissionHash":"6dd912f05dd5fae0bad49c49d357ca1a5b16b3f7b0d3c9412831a820494c9780","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51079","feedbackHash":"b4724744a0069a63d5ddee42bbc91a35c25329facf0f604d84bb54898bf08477","nodeKey":"item_0005","submissionHash":"8234b07a859997423af4ba49231e4ec0c2de082ee0f50adb93d3d279c34f3e03","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51731","feedbackHash":"b864cfcca00d5055bad121f0d397ecc84dd3ea79d44805b76256a06eea3fe0cf","nodeKey":"item_0006","submissionHash":"ce6e3271dc0c0a6a505bbcae6bc384020e4bf083569fd9be23c8c2deb481d4d7","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51519","feedbackHash":"24a090e07191182b400f995cd39b719120a2102f2d76b560044f1352d66cbbab","nodeKey":"item_0007","submissionHash":"1b8498b68b630b77d96d14d5cde496e03e88419bbff166429b74c2a8194dac0c","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52583","feedbackHash":"f59ebd4063805129a5527fa43908e57d02a5dfd3a58db914c0e8ed624e6c1c46","nodeKey":"item_0008","submissionHash":"ff95fd3e1cee3cd55499720608404dda3e84620ecdd74ffd3d89c3d4e38c7924","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51727","feedbackHash":"0b3fb92c45a2fd2981524547ab57859471e3376c786d9498568c39f61b415400","nodeKey":"item_0009","submissionHash":"2bcb4e21c84af87f5cb1d270279fa63a3ff34483fba5a63663ede1e334dfda25","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52584","feedbackHash":"a9ec2ef25ff771a1e4192d585caaeaef524e0b8d74dc5fb8af466272eea2acfb","nodeKey":"item_0010","submissionHash":"eff3c572dc48a6234960e7c2b0501617518f048a9ef3b320d8cabec56bf806bb","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51732","feedbackHash":"cb78981743cc5c12c22165f2aebd94881d4a3231473c706704db8dc2c2e348f7","nodeKey":"item_0011","submissionHash":"03e1ff6d7812fa0c3281ac17bf609677b907436ea7785308a4bd6b9eca7f254b","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52557","feedbackHash":"65abb46f02451428d637a16a2991943855de30b38dddcb02be467325b0c03089","nodeKey":"item_0012","submissionHash":"cc7126de545e9381f8e6d82b43b43e8ffc43aa5909a9a104ab36dace9c0c2516","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"50967","feedbackHash":"136058df53e18773c9e3f18afda49f28418a35f00ab3b8fa3dac69f8b4dc4bf9","nodeKey":"item_0013","submissionHash":"e3a20d14fe2dd44f91b94942806a8ca59100702d883f5d13aa07e011d6fdeec8","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52085","feedbackHash":"f0c8fe0ec0485790eb13485f6eaefffba94ee384625597d4fd856ea0b941beda","nodeKey":"item_0014","submissionHash":"0dc55eab0db2edd9984735ac07e764eb280dfd788fb0cb992a56ab00254715e1","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52131","feedbackHash":"624e0960b7f7c10488663c42b711134191260b0363b12f1cd8bc8779146797d3","nodeKey":"item_0015","submissionHash":"b84ec131fb1e2267ff73682af407821cc3a81835bf2615eb9fc38e0b2fdd045c","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52095","feedbackHash":"01f981ac86ac4f9d0b5f6e06768377fd099365d340d5975bbbe4ebe92c0242a4","nodeKey":"item_0016","submissionHash":"629a387d1b21630183eeb051a56117c849e3371a9072136d1103b5b4325384c1","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51035","feedbackHash":"8576fc032a8cff6dfbfa853ce9340d8d45ad370e07d26f7f793052541e948927","nodeKey":"item_0017","submissionHash":"b8d21cf3e873123e09e4669749b870890d00c7df575a79c5d6a5dbb30b343674","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51033","feedbackHash":"3c7b8655a01d769b14bd62348f261406993048f5dbae8ec820265ea592a3fa86","nodeKey":"item_0018","submissionHash":"8c748ceb9e05ee55ddc2ce20a242f56277d73cc1e3f12c40ad652144cc2bf55c","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51520","feedbackHash":"668b399292f3abb2d4a48464885e56cfdedcba29fa6318f2e10f1f4d0de1920c","nodeKey":"item_0019","submissionHash":"71bf617e25622340461cf31263d1df68dca583ab17bdbd3e9386f2b5d15f4dae","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52096","feedbackHash":"3cf0c589d307d112222aaa338cb814c8e4e1af1f356b265d91813b967e193fbe","nodeKey":"item_0020","submissionHash":"1f474d01744edea1b5fd5bfb456dac3471f23b53574ba2bfa6722b2fd16dc4d8","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"50982","feedbackHash":"efda26474c744f0b1039c2eec03b6d111db2eda615351c124c348a22fbcf9214","nodeKey":"item_0021","submissionHash":"a7cec0275d457b128b2d0c5f154be4c718d97290e47e1e1a0d07143262371724","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51729","feedbackHash":"4f6b3e85c3e08f219286b65865d8187eaf8ac5fc29dcef6a97c07929303a7b52","nodeKey":"item_0022","submissionHash":"42bf0c1f7600e8dab721cfe48dbef481c119ab62aba5ec3408062bacb3be84fd","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51737","feedbackHash":"3093c5f0a1ce8509b0a581c336ee3061ccc890f279d88a0f8265658da41db5cb","nodeKey":"item_0023","submissionHash":"a5195d2169a82af45ac112270a13b2e50d6c91db6dcd2ab65d3462a3ec377f9e","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51516","feedbackHash":"bae70dd986e06de144684ceaad6451514cdabe1bdb6d72539a281421ae37239b","nodeKey":"item_0024","submissionHash":"d8d5b64053bdc8c06dc9d9f55b4acf72cc270e3dcab5693aae2f1ed460d23f8e","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"50970","feedbackHash":"0a1bb0189979a37496aff4686d6a6f965e724a26229348bd6c7c50c26bfc5296","nodeKey":"item_0025","submissionHash":"0cb7c163c46aa207027b0988797b127c2c56b1887bb197c13d8d103a3c265e28","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52551","feedbackHash":"e1e41f60fe0de06fe8b429cfec30ee01e33ca1654e93b8f55e51161f54e4342e","nodeKey":"item_0026","submissionHash":"e2cf2ee3f69f6a01836f061d213173a44404c22e772230ba9606e42a842f5c77","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51473","feedbackHash":"c6d4f29b57c092e640308933d042a090db41a49428edb54ed7d2aa29ec9a9e8e","nodeKey":"item_0027","submissionHash":"b4b1cb156f00191fc7f2f7c96c1fda4e93f478fe2add61523315bb01e8adc9f0","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51544","feedbackHash":"455bdff2d0b43ec6d3f21eeee85901e43b588ce7032e38eb518f3d47e9bd37ee","nodeKey":"item_0028","submissionHash":"5363ce985ded2f3ae125638b593798b7be61027d8c219f87836fe183c194d5eb","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51026","feedbackHash":"a8d37fa17162b05b5d863dbb7ddd44fd9f79dc1c5cb8d500437fb6f59bc1b574","nodeKey":"item_0029","submissionHash":"ff4c41a5915f69d5ea615473eae831dfdedcbcf446e76cd875b7d7fc6650c9b2","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51543","feedbackHash":"0b794c80d3046a17b09b0e8dc43f79a9ba8798cbebf78d9b3c93f41a310f3aa1","nodeKey":"item_0030","submissionHash":"c9e4c04a23141185bcb7b61f45f66f558e5d421e6021196107e4c5dc0db5799a","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51521","feedbackHash":"d78f0430308d88ea7bf9a98963bdd561e0af234352d8e2cbcd95f1eece825da7","nodeKey":"merge_01","submissionHash":"5e71970ed7f7236eb8743a7a69ba71d1865b2582c633a75cca71935a90e134f0","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51489","feedbackHash":"1810a92b2ffc3067119b152e214d2647e0ec8844dfc25d7d2c18540c0a446b22","nodeKey":"merge_02","submissionHash":"6b7d91a4c4a1cc98f11cdeb37c075ad4d2ea9f64020af94400171d2ded126920","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52272","feedbackHash":"ba6a13585c04dff8311ee970420b1a822807a584565a04ce6c162bdcdb7cf091","nodeKey":"writeup","submissionHash":"0c3f7229d6dcbb26fdaeb941c7ce6f747a3da53d2fba1be766638c5a0e872c24","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"bb9fb35d42bceb029735012184bc8115bcaea925d4f37746fd3ae279b7148403","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[{"bytes":3730,"hash":"09e85e445b98991738e7a85af4ec57fc7f5007a06f1b78be353d5b8af178f7e8","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/mobius/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"75474cc326e8a817","findings":[],"hash":"03e1ff6d7812fa0c3281ac17bf609677b907436ea7785308a4bd6b9eca7f254b","nodeId":"e3fb0135-1481-4e03-83b6-6fcd11912b35","outcome":"completed","summary":"The result is written to [artifacts/goal/items/mobius/result.md](artifacts/goal/items/mobius/result.md) -- 3,730 bytes, well under the 6,000 limit.\n\nA quick summary of what's in there:\n\n- **The exploit**: May 11, 2025, BNB Chain, ~$2.15M taken. MobiusDAO lasted three days before a decimal-handling bug let an attacker mint 9.73 quadrillion MBU from a $0.67 deposit.\n- **Root cause**: The `deposit` function multiplied an already-18-decimal oracle price value by `1e18` a second time, inflating the mint amount by 18 orders of magnitude. No mint cap, no validation, no audit, no open-source code.\n- **Pattern**: Precision / decimal-scaling error -- a double multiplication of a fixed-point price value.\n- **Checks**: A basic unit test with real input values (0.001 WBNB at known price) would have caught the 10^18 discrepancy immediately. A fuzz invariant asserting the minted amount doesn't exceed deposited value times oracle price would fail for any non-zero input.\n- The rekt.news article was the primary source, which itself credits Quill Audits, Blockaid, Cyvers, AstraSec, and CertiK. The project's own post-mortem could not be found -- they reportedly blamed \"BSC Byzantine consensus mechanism\" rather than doing a real write-up.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":2078720,"inputTokens":227384,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":12934,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":11,"wallClockMs":418422}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":22352,"hash":"7d1b39f433356f1ecec76bcb6817e4c11c0eb7ae088eb675d7fdf9d6e0bf3971","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"report","path":"artifacts/goal/writeup/report.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"ef31844bb462de78","findings":[],"hash":"0c3f7229d6dcbb26fdaeb941c7ce6f747a3da53d2fba1be766638c5a0e872c24","nodeId":"c9fff350-a6f7-4cc9-b665-6beef89ab4c1","outcome":"completed","summary":"The deliverable is written to `artifacts/goal/writeup/report.md` (22,352 bytes, within the 40,000 byte limit).\n\n**What the report contains:**\n\n1. **Incident table** — all 30 incidents with date, chain, loss in USD, pattern, and whether it was a smart-contract bug (21 yes, 9 no).\n\n2. **Part A: Smart-Contract Checklist** — 9 groups, 33 checks:\n   - **A1. Token Contracts** (6 checks): minting integrity, decimal scaling, share-to-asset rounding, sale-contract overflow — covers zkLend, MobiusDAO, Resupply, Truebit\n   - **A2. Uniswap v4 Hooks** (4 checks): callback access control, transient-storage lifecycle, same-tx regression, multi-step rounding — covers Cork Protocol, SIR.trading, Bunni v2\n   - **A3. Vaults** (7 checks): ERC-4626 asset custody, inherited entry points, exchange-rate bounds, market initialization, liquidation state, fixed-point solver integrity — covers Meta Pool, Resupply, Abracadabra, Yearn yETH\n   - **A4. Upgradeable Proxies** (3 checks): atomic deploy+initialize, implementation-slot verification, slot-change monitoring — covers Kinto (CPIMP)\n   - **A5. Access Control** (5 checks): inverted requires, discarded auth results, meta-tx forwarder guards, bridge fast-path validation — covers SuperRare, Typus, KiloEx, CrossCurve\n   - **A6. External Calls** (4 checks): call target whitelisting, token-balance invariant, post-migration price assertion, pre-launch transfer restrictions — covers Arcadia, Silo, Four.meme\n   - **A7. Arithmetic** (8 checks): Yul pointer validation, library primitive fuzzing, batch-swap invariant, round-trip properties, time-decay bounds — covers 1inch, Cetus, Balancer, Cork\n   - **A8. Oracle** (2 checks): price-source identity verification, sanity bounds — covers Loopscale, Moonwell\n   - **A9. Reentrancy** (2 checks): nonReentrant guard, global accumulator invariant — covers GMX v1\n\n3. **Part B: Operational Controls** — 12 checks for the 9 non-code incidents: calldata inspection, canary monitoring, role inventories, post-airdrop cleanup, on-chain mint caps, timelocks on admin actions, multi-DVN bridge configs, cross-chain invariant monitoring, oracle CI tests, and post-audit change re-review — covers Bybit, Infini, ZKsync Airdrop, Resolv, Drift, KelpDAO, Moonwell, SuperRare, GMX v1, Loopscale.\n\n4. **Source index** — every incident's sources listed.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":477184,"inputTokens":73917,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":11461,"provider":"venice","runtime":"claude","turns":16,"wallClockMs":188712}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":2887,"hash":"feae91086b728d0bd696e606a85049904ee19124d29482104d0bf3e58eb31ac8","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/truebit/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"c2a0c6e1f08b5974","findings":[],"hash":"0cb7c163c46aa207027b0988797b127c2c56b1887bb197c13d8d103a3c265e28","nodeId":"0b05f727-7786-4323-bbc5-8a2c69099329","outcome":"completed","summary":"The result is written to `artifacts/goal/items/truebit/result.md` at 2,887 bytes, well within the 6,000-byte limit.\n\nHere's a quick rundown of what went in: the Truebit Protocol was exploited on January 8, 2026, for ~$26.5M (8,535 ETH) through an integer overflow in its `getPurchasePrice()` price curve. The contract was compiled with Solidity below 0.8.0, so the chained multiplications in the numerator (`100 * amount^2 * reserve + 200 * totalSupply * amount * reserve`) wrapped past 2^256 and the price computed to zero. The attacker minted TRU for free and sold it for real ETH.\n\nThe CertiK post-mortem was the primary source, supplemented by the DeFiHackLabs reproduction test and DefiLlama's database. The sources disagree slightly on the dollar figure ($26.4M vs $26.6M) -- a timing/price difference -- and that's called out. No rekt.news write-up was found for this one.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":3981824,"inputTokens":261295,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":51852,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":10,"wallClockMs":1166479}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5997,"hash":"9773653822d80f91b2d622d6ce3805c80927533352c432c34854c9087e450642","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/meta-pool/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"7ffab1989aa9150f","findings":[],"hash":"0dc55eab0db2edd9984735ac07e764eb280dfd788fb0cb992a56ab00254715e1","nodeId":"1746d973-f1a5-4a4e-8e2b-01aae7c7bb3a","outcome":"completed","summary":"The deliverable is complete and within limits.\n\n**`artifacts/goal/items/meta-pool/result.md`** - 5,997 bytes (limit 6,000), ASCII, all five required sections present, and it's the only file under `artifacts/`.\n\nSummary of what the note records:\n- **What happened:** June 17, 2025 on Ethereum; ~9,705 mpETH minted with no ETH deposited, notionally ~$27M but only ~52.5 ETH (~$130k-$133k) actually drained from thin pools, plus a ~$117k MEV front-run later returned. Where sources disagree (multi-chain ~56.35 ETH / ~$142k from SolidityScan; SlowMist's ~$25k; DeFiHackLabs' ~94.7 ETH PoC figure) each is given and flagged.\n- **Root cause:** not a key compromise - a mis-adapted OpenZeppelin `ERC4626Upgradeable`. The native-ETH override of `_deposit` dropped `safeTransferFrom`, but the inherited non-payable `mint()` was left reachable, so it credited shares and bumped `totalUnderlying` while collecting nothing.\n- **Pattern:** missing access control / unvalidated input on an inherited function, with a free-mint-plus-instant-liquidity shape (pseudocode, no working attack).\n- **Check:** a fuzz/invariant test asserting `totalUnderlying` can never rise by more than the assets actually received, a unit test that `mint(shares, ...)` with no value reverts, and a review rule to enumerate every entry point reaching `_deposit`.\n- **Sources:** project post-mortem first (Meta Pool's own Medium incident report), then SolidityScan, QuillAudits, OKX, crypto.news, crypto.training/DeFiHackLabs, Quadriga, and the Web3 Security Notion writeup.\n\nVerification: `wc -c` = 5997 bytes; `grep` confirms all six Markdown headings and zero non-ASCII bytes; `find artifacts -type f` shows only the one required file.\n\nNote on the machine: I only fetched public pages and wrote the one named output. I did not read home-directory config, keys, or run any machine-inspection commands.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":2747904,"inputTokens":536339,"model":"deepseek-v4-1-flash","outputTokens":26072,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":77,"wallClockMs":415344}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5127,"hash":"4681f8aa9b48be631b655940d1b9f5f0c43013e0555f314a2e0d80614355f440","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/abracadabra/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"6d18805b99aeb48a","findings":[],"hash":"1b8498b68b630b77d96d14d5cde496e03e88419bbff166429b74c2a8194dac0c","nodeId":"0b630c26-43d7-4629-8657-b149a9c0067b","outcome":"completed","summary":"The file is written and checks out: 5,127 bytes, well under the 6,000-byte cap. All five sections are present, every factual claim carries a source, and the note at the end flags what couldn't be found (Abracadabra's own post-mortem page, and specific analyses from the named security firms).\n\nThe core story is that a liquidation state-accounting desynchronization in the GMX v2 cauldrons let an attacker borrow against collateral that had already been seized -- the \"phantom collateral\" bug rekt.news named. The invariant check and the `isActive` review rule I suggested are the kind of thing that catches this class of bug before deployment.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":3748864,"inputTokens":205796,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":23026,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":4,"wallClockMs":730268}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5981,"hash":"cb413ac3b73aca5482c314552cabe711f6f89df753bfa027f3d06675cc8c437a","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/superrare/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"a2eadfa3e677016f","findings":[],"hash":"1f474d01744edea1b5fd5bfb456dac3471f23b53574ba2bfa6722b2fd16dc4d8","nodeId":"a56279c6-42fb-4a83-96d6-3bcabc4de411","outcome":"completed","summary":"Done. The deliverable is at [result.md](/home/imd15/.identitymd/work/0ffe079d-a62f-4510-b182-548f8f67f7b2/a56279c6-42fb-4a83-96d6-3bcabc4de411/artifacts/goal/items/superrare/result.md) at 5,981 bytes (under the 6000-byte cap), with all five required sections and 16 cited URLs.\n\nWhat the research settled:\n\n- **What happened:** On 2025-07-28, SuperRare's `RareStakingV1` staking contract on Ethereum was drained of ~11.9M RARE (~$730K). Amounts differ across sources (Cyvers $731,809.68; Verichains ~$680K; SupLabsYi $710K) and I report each with its source instead of picking one. A front-runner executed the actual drain after the original attacker's exploit contract was deployed.\n- **Root cause:** A tautological `require` in `updateMerkleRoot` — `msg.sender != owner() || msg.sender != 0xc2F3...` — which admits every caller. Not a key/signer compromise. Veridise and Cointelegraph both note the check was introduced in a late post-audit change and missed by final tests.\n- **Pattern:** Inverted/broken access control (OWASP SC01), with the vulnerable shape spelled out.\n- **The check:** A negative permission unit test, a caller-set fuzz invariant, and a post-audit re-review rule.\n\nTwo honest gaps flagged in the file: I could not find a first-party SuperRare/RareDAO post-mortem (the closest is co-founder Jonathan Perkins' remarks to Cointelegraph), and rekt.news has no dedicated article on this incident — the leaderboard was checked.\n\nNothing outside `artifacts/goal/items/superrare/` was written, and `artifacts/` plus my scratch dir are git-excluded, so no out-of-scope changes can be committed.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":3485696,"inputTokens":522102,"model":"deepseek-v4-1-flash","outputTokens":35796,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":97,"wallClockMs":534574}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5133,"hash":"a939881994ed22036a025d8d7f8a70dfca0220ad8c55aa830e960077503937cd","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/zksync-airdrop/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"6e1819675bb7567a","findings":[],"hash":"2bcb4e21c84af87f5cb1d270279fa63a3ff34483fba5a63663ede1e334dfda25","nodeId":"46cd1cdd-e852-4ccf-8f67-cea4ad44114b","outcome":"completed","summary":"The file is written at `artifacts/goal/items/zksync-airdrop/result.md` — 5,133 bytes, well under the 6,000 byte cap.\n\nThe incident was a compromised admin key on April 15, 2025 that let an attacker call `sweepUnclaimed()` on three airdrop distribution contracts, minting ~111M ZK worth ~$5M. The hacker later returned 90% of the funds for a 10% bounty. The pattern is straightforward: a single-key admin gate on a post-airdrop mint function that should have been timelocked, multi-sig guarded, or permanently disabled after the claim window closed.\n\nI checked for analyses from BlockSec, SlowMist, CertiK, and rekt.news specifically — none had published coverage of this incident. Halborn and Web3Exploit did, and those are cited alongside ZKsync's own Mirror post-mortem, Cointelegraph, The Block, CoinMarketCap Academy, and others.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":4064512,"inputTokens":343257,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":37030,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":10,"wallClockMs":946627}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5984,"hash":"139237ea5bd6b1d5fd2973ab9b2042c0ae402cbf91c7873403fa02cbfcfda5bd","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/typus/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"b312209aac1edeae","findings":[],"hash":"42bf0c1f7600e8dab721cfe48dbef481c119ab62aba5ec3408062bacb3be84fd","nodeId":"311c52fc-3626-4142-b0e9-6eb9294b363e","outcome":"completed","summary":"The deliverable is complete.\n\n**Done:** `artifacts/goal/items/typus/result.md` — 5,984 bytes (under the 6,000 limit), with all five required sections, written only under the allowed path (untracked scratch work stays in `test/scratch/`).\n\nKey findings, all sourced:\n- **What happened:** Typus Finance's TLP pool on Sui, exploited Oct 15, 2025 (13:05 UTC first tx, paused by 13:39), ~$3.44M — 588,357.9 SUI, 1,604,034.7 USDC, 0.6 xBTC, 32.227 suiETH, per the project's own post-mortem. I recorded the disagreement across sources ($3M / $3.4M / $3.44M) rather than picking one silently.\n- **Root cause:** a smart-contract bug, not a key compromise — `update_v2` in the custom oracle module called `vector::contains(...)` for its whitelist check but discarded the returned `bool` (no `assert!`), and `UpdateAuthority` was a shared object, so any address could rewrite oracle prices. I verified the vulnerable line directly in the pre-fix GitHub source (commit `a918e98`).\n- **Pattern:** missing access control / authorization bypass, with the vulnerable shape shown as pseudocode.\n- **Check:** a negative unit test asserting non-whitelisted callers abort, plus a review rule/lint that every pure-function security predicate must feed an `assert!`/`if`, with the whitelist invariant.\n\nSourcing notes I flagged: I found no dedicated rekt.news post-mortem and no BlockSec/CertiK/Verichains write-up; the Medium post-mortem and SlowMist analysis returned HTTP 403 on direct fetch, so both were read via Wayback snapshots (URLs included).\n\nVerification: confirmed the file exists at the exact path, is the only file written under `artifacts/`, stays within the byte limit, and contains every named section. Nothing outside `artifacts/goal/items/typus/` was modified.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1420288,"inputTokens":371873,"model":"deepseek-v4-1-flash","outputTokens":27451,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":53,"wallClockMs":210261}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"d192c3efd847050a","findings":[],"hash":"4b3d2b5230632fc201cbd2c5a3b24cca28d2a9441ec27b17b1681ad537fa712b","nodeId":"3708637d-4913-4308-a47b-1eeb4a2908b7","outcome":"failed","summary":"required outputs are missing or invalid:\nartifacts/goal/items/drift/result.md: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd20/.identitymd/work/0ffe079d-a62f-4510-b182-548f8f67f7b2/3708637d-4913-4308-a47b-1eeb4a2908b7/artifacts/goal/items/drift/result.md'\n\nthe agent stopped (max_turns, 61 turns) without a final message","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1246464,"inputTokens":332409,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":43811,"provider":"venice","runtime":"claude","turns":61,"wallClockMs":917521}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5207,"hash":"7bca1ca849ce94f087f793b253b3ebb4a0e7f23d731dc8caed4181835952946a","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/resolv/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"cf6bec70b883c22a","findings":[],"hash":"5363ce985ded2f3ae125638b593798b7be61027d8c219f87836fe183c194d5eb","nodeId":"4d192284-1674-4273-9240-e868e6a1e192","outcome":"completed","summary":"The deliverable is complete and verified.\n\n**What I did:** Researched Resolv's March 22, 2026 USR exploit from the project's own post-mortem first, then cross-checked against Chainalysis, rekt.news, The Block, CoinDesk, Cointelegraph, The Defiant, BeInCrypto, and security-firm/analyst threads (Hacken, QuillAudits, Vadim, D2 Finance).\n\n**The finding, briefly:** it was not a smart-contract bug. A contractor's reused GitHub credential led attackers into Resolv's repos, where a malicious CI/CD workflow exfiltrated cloud credentials; they then rewrote the AWS KMS key's access policy to seize signing authority over the `SERVICE_ROLE` mint key. That key's `completeSwap` path had no ratio check, no oracle, and no mint ceiling, so ~$100K-$200K of USDC became 80M unbacked USR and roughly $25M in ETH, depegging the token to ~$0.025. The write-up gives the fuzz/invariant test and the operational controls (multisig/MPC signing, on-chain mint cap, monitoring-driven auto-pause) that would have stopped it.\n\n**Deliverable:** [result.md](/home/imd10/.identitymd/work/0ffe079d-a62f-4510-b182-548f8f67f7b2/4d192284-1674-4273-9240-e868e6a1e192/artifacts/goal/items/resolv/result.md) — 5207 bytes, under the 6000-byte cap, with all five sections and per-fact source references. Amount/date discrepancies between sources are stated explicitly, and the absence of any BlockSec/SlowMist/CertiK/Halborn/Verichains write-up is noted rather than guessed.\n\nIt's the only file under `artifacts/`, left untracked (git-ignored, so it stays out of any commit), and my research scaffolding lives only in `test/scratch/`, which is outside the deliverable paths.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":2900480,"inputTokens":571997,"model":"deepseek-v4-1-flash","outputTokens":27873,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":61,"wallClockMs":363394}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":32108,"hash":"52e547a2e8f92019eb3319f4468aef056308ddd16a20f05de3566cf56ce6c20a","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"merge","path":"artifacts/goal/merges/01/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"e698c63d215db960","findings":[],"hash":"5e71970ed7f7236eb8743a7a69ba71d1865b2582c633a75cca71935a90e134f0","nodeId":"c1867654-a3df-4c9f-9fa4-dad650e1a8b6","outcome":"completed","summary":"All 15 incidents are present, the file is 32,108 bytes (well under the 64 KB limit), and the structure is clean. Every incident has all five sections preserved: what happened, root cause, pattern, check, and sources. Disagreements between sources are noted where they exist (zkLend loss figures, Infini role hex, KiloEx loss range, Cetus loss range, SIR.trading date discrepancy, Meta Pool loss range, Loopscale conflicting theories). No incident is missing, and no finding was invented — sources are carried through from the input notes.\n\nThe merged deliverable is at `artifacts/goal/merges/01/result.md`.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":227072,"inputTokens":40126,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":11689,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":6,"wallClockMs":254089}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5760,"hash":"ed1b17ecd6596b05ece9b27d94a18dafc0a6677e0c4dfdf0b68de33e484d5a7a","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/resupply/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"8310b806f0fcfbea","findings":[],"hash":"629a387d1b21630183eeb051a56117c849e3371a9072136d1103b5b4325384c1","nodeId":"71a67e62-abd5-4004-809f-f8ad5f0f31d3","outcome":"completed","summary":"Done. The deliverable is written and verified.\n\nThe file [result.md](/home/imd14/.identitymd/work/0ffe079d-a62f-4510-b182-548f8f67f7b2/71a67e62-abd5-4004-809f-f8ad5f0f31d3/artifacts/goal/items/resupply/result.md) is 5760 bytes (under the 6000-byte cap), sits at the only permitted path, and nothing else was left under `artifacts/`.\n\nWhat it covers, with a source URL on each fact:\n\n- **What happened:** June 26, 2025 on Ethereum; the tx at 01:53:59 UTC, ~1h35m after the market's 00:18:47 UTC deployment. Amounts reported differ ($9.5M–$10M) and each figure is attributed to its source; the rekt.news \"June 25th\" body date is flagged as inconsistent with its own June 27 dateline and the primary sources. Attack netted ~1,581 ETH.\n- **Root cause:** stated plainly as a code/config flaw, not a key compromise. The pair priced ERC-4626 collateral via `convertToAssets(1e18)` and set `_exchangeRate = 1e36 / price`; a donation into the zero-deposit vault pushed the price past 1e36 so floor division drove the rate to 0, collapsing the LTV check.\n- **Pattern:** ERC-4626 donation/empty-market inflation plus a rounding-to-zero precision bug degenerating a solvency check, shown as a non-working pseudocode sketch.\n- **The check:** a fuzz/invariant test asserting `_exchangeRate > 0` (enforced with a guard), plus pre-deployment liquidity validation, tied to the ChainSecurity/Electi scope statements from rekt.news.\n- **Sources:** all nine URLs read, including BlockSec's analysis, Resupply's own post-mortem (Wayback mirror of the mirror.xyz post), rekt.news, Ackee, QuillAudits, Decrypt, CryptoPotato, The Block, and the Resupply overview.\n\nVerification: file exists at the required path, byte count checked, and `git status` confirms it is untracked/ignored so the daemon uploads it separately.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":2515712,"inputTokens":510102,"model":"deepseek-v4-1-flash","outputTokens":30763,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":72,"wallClockMs":719224}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"82692ab5f7f7e54e","findings":[],"hash":"6666074df8d1d13a3f8bba88b1923caa010bb9ecef35a3ef1cf6f62fe8895d7d","nodeId":"0fd44c91-660b-4cb0-8a2c-5b049659d388","outcome":"failed","summary":"required outputs are missing or invalid:\nartifacts/goal/items/silo/result.md: ENOENT: no such file or directory, lstat '/home/imd/.identitymd-38/work/0ffe079d-a62f-4510-b182-548f8f67f7b2/0fd44c91-660b-4cb0-8a2c-5b049659d388/artifacts/goal/items/silo/result.md'\n\nthe agent stopped (max_turns, 61 turns) without a final message","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1695744,"inputTokens":510277,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":45583,"provider":"venice","runtime":"claude","turns":61,"wallClockMs":932956}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":63956,"hash":"823709a8abbc25a968bd546abb00b4ffc3f8e223f4602c56024137d3db1d5c1b","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"merge","path":"artifacts/goal/merges/02/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"e8b60b2d2d013a4d","findings":[],"hash":"6b7d91a4c4a1cc98f11cdeb37c075ad4d2ea9f64020af94400171d2ded126920","nodeId":"e903d913-975d-4004-8c1d-2804719d1def","outcome":"completed","summary":"Those matches are all legitimate code inside fenced blocks, not corruption. The deliverable is complete and verified.\n\n**Done.** I merged all 15 incident notes into [result.md](/home/imd2/.identitymd/work/0ffe079d-a62f-4510-b182-548f8f67f7b2/e903d913-975d-4004-8c1d-2804719d1def/artifacts/goal/merges/02/result.md).\n\nWhat it contains:\n- A header noting all 15 inputs were present and non-empty (no incident note missing), plus a quick index table.\n- One section per incident (Resupply, GMX v1, Kinto, Arcadia, SuperRare, Bunni, Typus, Balancer, Yearn yETH, Truebit, CrossCurve, Moonwell, Resolv, Drift, KelpDAO), each keeping its loss, root cause, pattern, the check that would have caught it, and **every source URL** from the input note.\n- Explicit disagreement callouts where notes differ: loss ranges, conflicting dates, and whether a first-party post-mortem exists (e.g. Resupply's June 25 vs 26, Bunni's Sep 1 vs 2, Kinto's self-contradictory timeline, CrossCurve's Jan 31 vs Feb 1 vs Feb 2, and the ten incidents with differing USD figures).\n- A cross-incident pattern summary and a \"noted source gap\" list naming the incidents whose project post-mortem or named security-firm write-up was unavailable, with what each still rests on.\n\nVerification: file is 63,956 bytes (under the 64,000 cap); 15 sections each carrying all five required elements; a scripted check confirmed **every URL in all 15 input notes appears in the merged file**; code fences are balanced (16 blocks); and the file is the only thing written under the allowed path (`artifacts/goal/merges/02/`), left untracked as required.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":17473280,"inputTokens":729266,"model":"deepseek-v4-1-flash","outputTokens":121704,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":138,"wallClockMs":469748}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5951,"hash":"57b2b48f24c8a4ba81b2db112ab0b88dd6fc909d0a75e5254734f0abb269a288","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/infini/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"4895726008c69d01","findings":[],"hash":"6dd912f05dd5fae0bad49c49d357ca1a5b16b3f7b0d3c9412831a820494c9780","nodeId":"f3480ae6-288c-478d-8fcd-9a155b42d7f1","outcome":"completed","summary":"Done. The deliverable is in place.\n\n**`artifacts/goal/items/infini/result.md`** (5,951 bytes, under the 6000 cap), covering:\n\n- **What happened** - 24 Feb 2025, Ethereum, ~$49.5M USDC (11,455,666.71 + 38,060,996.26 USDC, confirmed against the two Blockscout transaction records), swapped USDC→DAI→~17,696 ETH. Notes the $49.5M vs \"$50M\" rounding disagreement and cites each.\n- **Root cause** - stated plainly as compromised privileged access, not a contract logic bug: an unverified vault contract with a `0x8e0b` all-funds-withdraw role on a single EOA. Records where sources diverge (leaked key vs. rogue developer retaining the role; `0x8e0b` vs rekt's `0x8e9b`).\n- **Pattern** - key/signer compromise plus excessive retained admin authority, with a pseudocode sketch of the flawed shape (never a working attack).\n- **Check that would have caught it** - a pre-launch role-inventory unit test plus a concrete withdraw-path invariant/fuzz test.\n- **Sources** - every URL read, including the two on-chain tx records and the founder/project X posts; also states that no formal project post-mortem document was found.\n\nEvery checkable claim carries its source URL, disagreements are flagged rather than smoothed over, and what couldn't be found is said outright. A few search engines and some security-firm pages were captcha- or 404-blocked, so I worked through the reader-accessible primary and secondary pages (rekt.news, Halborn, QuillAudits, Decrypt, Lookonchain, and Blockscout) instead.\n\nNothing was written outside `artifacts/goal/items/infini/` (scratch work lives in `test/scratch/`, which isn't submitted).","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1577216,"inputTokens":479127,"model":"deepseek-v4-1-flash","outputTokens":25842,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":60,"wallClockMs":762407}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":4038,"hash":"fc200bc62f3db5845f9e84e69eeb166a39b70026e865700245d1d5cc8bf7ed3f","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/arcadia/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"95ad198755c46766","findings":[],"hash":"71bf617e25622340461cf31263d1df68dca583ab17bdbd3e9386f2b5d15f4dae","nodeId":"47d0eb10-4514-4dd3-8b28-31a99f38dd77","outcome":"completed","summary":"The result is written and under the 6,000-byte cap at 4,038 bytes. Here's a quick summary of what's in there:\n\n**What happened:** ArcadiaFi lost $3.6M on Base across two waves on July 14-15, 2025. Funds were bridged to Ethereum mainnet via Across Protocol.\n\n**Root cause:** The `_swapViaRouter()` function in the RebalancerSpot contract passed attacker-supplied `router` and `data` directly to a low-level `call()` with no whitelist validation. The attacker registered a malicious contract as a whitelisted Account + router, then drained victim accounts through the trusted Rebalancer context. Three audits never looked at the Rebalancer; the one that did (Pashov) flagged the issue but closed it as unexploitable and never communicated it.\n\n**Pattern:** Unvalidated input / arbitrary external call -- a trusted contract forwards caller-supplied calldata to an unvalidated target address via `.call()`.\n\n**Checks:** Whitelist-enforced router validation with a unit test; plus an invariant fuzzing arbitrary Account/router/calldata combinations to catch exploit paths.\n\n**Sources:** Both the rekt.news article and leaderboard were retrieved and cited. The project's own Medium post-mortem and Pashov's blog were unreachable (Cloudflare/blocked), so that gap is disclosed in the sources section along with the secondary references credited by rekt.news (CertiK, Cyvers, Chaofan Shou, Pashov).","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1973248,"inputTokens":169158,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":18181,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":9,"wallClockMs":494973}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5956,"hash":"2e0a512714d59e902cdb3718ad0149c8d435fa717d80d6d9cff15b2d94866471","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/oneinch-fusion/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"4f646c6931822e60","findings":[],"hash":"8234b07a859997423af4ba49231e4ec0c2de082ee0f50adb93d3d279c34f3e03","nodeId":"60877eb9-c757-4ea5-a4f4-763959ef1127","outcome":"completed","summary":"The result is written. Here's a summary of what I found and put into [result.md](artifacts/goal/items/oneinch-fusion/result.md):\n\n**The exploit**: March 5, 2025, on Ethereum mainnet. An attacker used an integer underflow in the Yul assembly of `_settleOrder` to corrupt memory pointers and hijack the resolver address, draining roughly $5M (2.4M USDC + 1,276 WETH) from the market maker TrustedVolumes. After on-chain negotiations, most funds were returned minus about $450K kept as an ad-hoc \"bounty.\"\n\n**The core bug**: The Yul assembly computed a write destination as `add(add(ptr, interactionOffset), interactionLength)` where `interactionLength` was user-supplied. Setting it to `0xffff...fe00` (effectively -512) caused the pointer to underflow, landing the suffix write in attacker-controlled calldata rather than after the legitimate data. Nine audits over two years missed it because it lived in a Yul block (where Solidity 0.8.x safe-math doesn't apply) and in a function that fell out of scope after a refactor.\n\n**Key sources**: rekt.news (narrative, amounts, negotiation details), Decurity (Omar Ganiev's technical postmortem via blog.decurity.io), DeFiHackLabs (reproduction test), and the vulnerable Settlement.sol commit. The Decurity blog itself was unreachable from this machine's sandbox, but the postmortem's existence and role are confirmed by two independent sources (rekt.news and DeFiHackLabs) plus the DecurityHQ Twitter announcement.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":4221952,"inputTokens":133621,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":30290,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":37,"wallClockMs":735189}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5240,"hash":"f6dbe01c44dc7eb33b124d021fd379be7755bf6258de5e64833cfb638018d0b7","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/kinto/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"8576036969b9332c","findings":[],"hash":"8c748ceb9e05ee55ddc2ce20a242f56277d73cc1e3f12c40ad652144cc2bf55c","nodeId":"82efdf21-8169-4d5b-8c03-19ec536b86ae","outcome":"completed","summary":"Under the 6000-byte cap at 5240 bytes, and the only file under `artifacts/` is the deliverable.\n\n**Check summary**\n\n- Verified all facts against the project post-mortem plus Dedaub's and Nethermind's technical write-ups, rekt.news, and The Defiant; each claim carries its source.\n- Recorded the disagreements: the post-mortem's own self-contradiction on whether the upgrade happened \"9 July 20:17 UTC\" or \"10 July 08:40 UTC\" (rekt and The Defiant both say 10 July), and the early \"nearly 7M $K minted\" figure versus the 110,000 used by the team and later reporting.\n- Root cause is stated plainly as a deployment/config flaw in an uninitialized ERC-1967 proxy (CPIMP), not a key compromise or Kinto logic bug.\n- Section 4 gives an atomic-deployment unit test and a deployment invariant specific to this incident.\n- Stated that no Kinto-specific analysis from BlockSec/SlowMist/CertiK/Halborn/Verichains/QuillAudits could be found.\n\n**Deliverable:** [result.md](/home/imd/.identitymd-2/work/0ffe079d-a62f-4510-b182-548f8f67f7b2/82efdf21-8169-4d5b-8c03-19ec536b86ae/artifacts/goal/items/kinto/result.md), 5240 bytes. Nothing else was written inside the allowed paths, and no configuration files were touched.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":2438912,"inputTokens":502199,"model":"deepseek-v4-1-flash","outputTokens":27918,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":64,"wallClockMs":556560}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5988,"hash":"e28a62f8973a92bbf81fb0b27c4652c7ea3fad5cc6215475aaa7678a80453028","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/four-meme/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"43eaeedfc1287bf1","findings":[],"hash":"912dbf0c628a1a668f5ea7302d7ca4eef90b989fac07372be1f8b2d2292e65b2","nodeId":"7e49d9bc-f4dd-490c-994d-271d112cac34","outcome":"completed","summary":"The deliverable is complete: a single markdown file at `artifacts/goal/items/four-meme/result.md`, 5988 bytes (under the 6000 cap), ASCII-only, and untracked.\n\nWhat it covers:\n- **What happened** for both BNB Chain incidents, with disagreeing figures listed side by side: Feb 11, 2025 (~$183K per PeckShield/Verichains/most press, \"186k (287bnb)\" per DeFiHackLabs, \"almost $200K\" per Protos, but only ~$15K for the one demonstrated token in the Zero Time analysis) and Mar 18, 2025 (~$120K per ExVul/CertiK vs ~$130K per CryptoSlate/CoinTab).\n- **Root cause**: not a key or signer compromise, but the migration reusing a permissionlessly pre-created/initialized PancakeSwap V3 pool (the `createAndInitializePoolIfNecessary` silent no-op, sqrtPriceX96 = 1e40 against an intended ~2.7e25), with a March variant that abused the `0x7f79f6df` pre-launch buy path to bypass the transfer restriction on the pre-computable pair address.\n- **Pattern**: unvalidated external state / launch-pool price manipulation plus unchecked slippage, shown as a flawed-shape pseudocode sketch.\n- **Checks**: post-migration `slot0().sqrtPriceX96` assertion, a mint invariant/fuzz test, non-zero `amount0Min`/`amount1Min`, and a transfer-restriction review rule.\n- **Sources**: 19 URLs, each fact tagged with the source it came from.\n\nTwo notes on sourcing: rekt.news had no Four.meme write-up (its `/four-meme` route returned HTTP 500 and its sitemap was unavailable), and I could not reach an official Four.meme post-mortem, so the project's own statements are cited as its X posts. Both are stated in the file rather than papered over. All research went to `test/scratch/` only, which the verifier deletes.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":9713152,"inputTokens":841716,"model":"deepseek-v4-1-flash","outputTokens":75689,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":136,"wallClockMs":883746}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":4115,"hash":"26ce75f76f2038a501fefa98d82aa3b7cc15674df19174015edc6fd8f0e14590","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/balancer/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"bc30da9213bc5d7a","findings":[],"hash":"a5195d2169a82af45ac112270a13b2e50d6c91db6dcd2ab65d3462a3ec377f9e","nodeId":"f1d7bfec-7503-48d7-9c7e-958b11ae7b7e","outcome":"completed","summary":"The result is ready at `artifacts/goal/items/balancer/result.md` — 4,115 bytes, within the 6,000 limit.\n\nA quick summary of what's there:\n\n- **Date and loss**: November 3, 2025, across Ethereum and five L2s. rekt.news says $128M, QuillAudits says ~$125M, and I note the inconsistency inside Balancer's own post-mortem ($94.8M vs $121.1M).\n- **Root cause**: asymmetric rounding (`mulDown` vs `divUp`/`divDown`) in the Composable Stable Pool scaling path, exploited through `batchSwap` atomicity.\n- **Pattern**: precision/rounding asymmetry, with pseudocode showing the vulnerable shape.\n- **Checks**: an invariant fuzz test on `D_post >= D_pre - fees` across batch sequences, and a round-trip property test requiring conservative (never-underreporting) rounding on every scaling path.\n- **Sources**: rekt.news, QuillAudits, and the Balancer PR #322 that touched the relevant rounding code. I flagged that the official Medium post-mortem was blocked by Cloudflare, and that searches for BlockSec, SlowMist, CertiK, Halborn, and Verichains analyses turned up nothing accessible.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":2883584,"inputTokens":90181,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":26679,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":27,"wallClockMs":624972}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":4665,"hash":"3e2e08b3c3a983c6de72ba4c2f28ccf96e4bcf308dc8dac3ed58606e7cb27ce8","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/bunni/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"a7313281793d3077","findings":[],"hash":"a7cec0275d457b128b2d0c5f154be4c718d97290e47e1e1a0d07143262371724","nodeId":"b62a95ca-4cdc-4a66-9898-61532f0238d6","outcome":"completed","summary":"The deliverable is complete: [artifacts/goal/items/bunni/result.md](/root/nft1/.identitymd/work/0ffe079d-a62f-4510-b182-548f8f67f7b2/b62a95ca-4cdc-4a66-9898-61532f0238d6/artifacts/goal/items/bunni/result.md) — 4665 bytes, well within the 6000-byte limit.\n\nHere's how it breaks down:\n\n- **What happened**: September 1, 2025, Ethereum and Unichain, ~$8.4M. USDC/USDT ($2.4M) and ETH/weETH ($6M) pools hit by a three-step exploit: flashloan swap to crater active balance, 44 tiny withdrawals exploiting rounding to collapse liquidity, then sandwiching the bounce-back.\n- **Root cause**: Rounding-direction error in `BunniHubLogic::withdraw()` — `mulDiv` rounded down, safe in isolation but exploitable when chained 44 times on a dust-level balance. Fix was one line: `mulDiv` to `mulDivUp`.\n- **Pattern**: Rounding/precision error in multi-step state updates — a conservative rounding choice that holds for single operations becomes lethal when accumulated across many small operations and then reversed.\n- **The check**: An invariant fuzz test (Foundry/Medusa) on liquidity consistency across repeated tiny withdrawals when the active balance is pushed to dust, plus a review rule requiring justification of rounding direction across sequences, not just singly.\n- **Sources**: Bunni's own post-mortem, rekt.news, Cyfrin's gist breakdown, BlockSec/CertiK/Hacken alerts, and the Trail of Bits and Cyfrin audit reports. The date discrepancy (Sept 1 vs Sept 2) between rekt and Bunni is noted as likely timezone-related.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":879360,"inputTokens":81543,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":11506,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":10,"wallClockMs":253602}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":4968,"hash":"a668c84ab869b08b4c2d206f93298f5c90ab8c0824687b358c3e6bbae927b80c","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/zklend/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"3c1226d190150ef0","findings":[],"hash":"acf26dac8ad1705c3b1f4580342091a6fbae1c177dcb6a396d7f6d981717db2e","nodeId":"3d05a335-6052-43ed-aa71-97d9aa3db0f4","outcome":"completed","summary":"The result is written to `artifacts/goal/items/zklend/result.md` (4,968 bytes, under the 6,000-byte limit).\n\n**Summary of findings:**\n\n- **Date:** February 11–12, 2025 (sources split on exact day; likely attack on 11th, disclosure on 12th)\n- **Chain:** Starknet, funds later bridged to Ethereum L1\n- **Amount:** ~$9.5–10M (five sources, minor variance: $9.57M to ~$10M)\n- **Root cause:** Rounding/precision loss in the `zToken` burn function — integer division truncation combined with an attacker-inflated lending accumulator allowed withdrawing far more than deposited\n- **Pattern:** Accumulator-based lending math with downward rounding favoring the user rather than the protocol\n- **Key check:** Fuzz testing across extreme accumulator values with the invariant \"no user can withdraw more than deposited + accrued interest\" would have caught this\n\nFive sources were successfully fetched and cited. The zkLend official post-mortem on Medium and the SlowMist Medium analysis both returned 403 (access denied) and could not be retrieved, but the five independent sources (rekt.news, BlockSec, Halborn, SolidityScan, Verichains) provide consistent, overlapping coverage of all required facts.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":933120,"inputTokens":165430,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":23871,"provider":"venice","runtime":"claude","turns":119,"wallClockMs":758680}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":4580,"hash":"e90f680a155e9dd028b25d3e0fc3cc6ede3bdfbb332170e58aa9741a3876e363","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/moonwell/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"dc34db8e17664ebd","findings":[],"hash":"b4b1cb156f00191fc7f2f7c96c1fda4e93f478fe2add61523315bb01e8adc9f0","nodeId":"71575844-ff11-4b35-9ea1-6b9c47c4777a","outcome":"completed","summary":"The deliverable is written at `artifacts/goal/items/moonwell/result.md` — 4,580 bytes, within the 6,000 byte limit.\n\n**Summary of findings:**\n\nThe Moonwell cbETH oracle exploit occurred on **February 15, 2026** on Base, causing **$1,779,044.83** in bad debt. The root cause was a **configuration error**: the oracle fed only the cbETH/ETH exchange rate (~1.12) and treated it as a dollar value, instead of multiplying by ETH/USD to get the correct ~$2,200 price. The flawed config was introduced in PR #578 (co-authored by Claude Opus 4.6) and passed governance with 99.1% approval.\n\n**Three sources confirmed the details:**\n- rekt.news provided the primary technical analysis and historical context\n- Moonwell's governance forum had the official post-mortem by AnthiasLabs\n- GitHub PR #578 showed where the bug was introduced and that a reviewer raised an unresolved concern about the cbETH price calculation\n\n**What I could not find:** Dedicated analyses from BlockSec, SlowMist, CertiK, Halborn, or Verichains for this specific incident. QuillAudits covered a *different* Moonwell exploit (the mMAMO donation attack of August 2026). This is noted in the sources section.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":775424,"inputTokens":290639,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":33261,"provider":"venice","runtime":"claude","turns":70,"wallClockMs":650023}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":4371,"hash":"95cbb6e98587e4f93ee15a5da1f31dd3a5da0a5b7c8916e831519d3c8cbf135f","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/silo/result.md"}],"attempt":2,"bundleHash":null,"device":"de319b702da6aa2e","findings":[],"hash":"b84ec131fb1e2267ff73682af407821cc3a81835bf2615eb9fc38e0b2fdd045c","nodeId":"0fd44c91-660b-4cb0-8a2c-5b049659d388","outcome":"completed","summary":"The result is written to `artifacts/goal/items/silo/result.md` (4,371 bytes, under the 6,000 byte limit).\n\n**Summary of findings:**\n\n- **Date:** June 25, 2025\n- **Chains:** Ethereum mainnet and Sonic\n- **Loss:** 224 ETH (~$522K–$550K, sources disagree slightly due to ETH price timing)\n- **What was taken:** SiloDAO funds from a pre-release leverage contract `LeverageUsingSiloFlashloanWithGeneralSwap`; no user funds affected\n- **Root cause:** Improper input validation — the `_swapArgs` calldata parameter was executed blindly without any allowlist or validation, letting an attacker inject a borrow operation instead of a swap\n- **Pattern:** Unvalidated input / calldata injection\n- **Key check:** Validate target address and function selector against an allowlist before forwarding user-supplied calldata; an invariant that contract balances only decrease through the intended swap path would have caught this in fuzzing\n\n**Sources found and used:**\n- QuillAudits analysis (primary technical source)\n- Etherscan (on-chain verification of attacker addresses, contract, and laundering tx)\n\n**Honestly reported as not found:** Silo Finance's own post-mortem (their blog/forum domains don't resolve, nothing on GitHub), analyses by BlockSec/SlowMist/CertiK/Halborn/Verichains, and rekt.news coverage.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":931072,"inputTokens":221826,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":27647,"provider":"venice","runtime":"claude","turns":97,"wallClockMs":605693}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":4338,"hash":"dae0b7d828b3b1408d7bbd8fbdf7a18418fcbe3c2b93f36ff1649f03dd03d2b5","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/gmx-v1/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"8472a2af9a9cf974","findings":[],"hash":"b8d21cf3e873123e09e4669749b870890d00c7df575a79c5d6a5dbb30b343674","nodeId":"d0a9af59-af2f-4c59-9b5f-099e4ff21ef5","outcome":"completed","summary":"Done. The result is written to `artifacts/goal/items/gmx-v1/result.md` (4,338 bytes, under the 6,000 byte limit).\n\n**Summary of findings:**\n\n- **Date**: 9 July 2025\n- **Chain**: Arbitrum\n- **Amount**: ~$42M drained from the GLP pool\n- **Root cause**: Cross-contract reentrancy in `executeDecreaseOrder()` — the gas refund callback to the attacker's contract handed over execution control mid-transaction, allowing a reentrant call to `increasePosition()` on the Vault that bypassed price-calculation middleware\n- **Pattern**: Reentrancy (callback-based, cross-contract) distorting a shared global accumulator (`globalShortAveragePrices`)\n- **Outcome**: White-hat disclosure; ~$40M returned, ~$5M kept as bounty\n- **Audit gap**: The bug was introduced in a 2022 fix for a prior bounty and the patched code was never re-audited\n\nTwo sources agree on all material facts: rekt.news and QuillAudits. GMX's official Notion post-mortem was inaccessible (authentication required); BlockSec, SlowMist, CertiK, Halborn, and Verichains pages either 404'd, 403'd, or redirected. These gaps are noted in the file.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":666368,"inputTokens":104125,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":16986,"provider":"venice","runtime":"claude","turns":82,"wallClockMs":410279}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5998,"hash":"947d28e888349960d5b4da3b82f50d5f169dc212ec2fe3bc45a98abc9ed6a1b2","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/kelp/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"d67cd7a060b21c9f","findings":[],"hash":"c9e4c04a23141185bcb7b61f45f66f558e5d421e6021196107e4c5dc0db5799a","nodeId":"c1789082-4005-467c-9114-ee097034b470","outcome":"completed","summary":"The deliverable is complete: only `artifacts/goal/items/kelp/result.md` (5998 bytes, under the 6000 cap) exists in the output path.\n\n**Summary**\n\nI researched the KelpDAO rsETH bridge exploit (2026-04-18, Ethereum + Unichain) and wrote the required markdown note.\n\nKey findings, all sourced:\n- **What happened:** 116,500 rsETH (~$292M at the time) released from the rstETH OFT Adapter on Ethereum by a forged cross-chain message claiming to originate from KelpDAO's Unichain OApp. Sources disagree on the figure ($292M / $290M / $293.7M / $294M), and I gave each with its source.\n- **Root cause:** Not a smart-contract bug. A LayerZero developer was socially engineered (malicious GitHub repo, macOS malware) in March 2026; harvested session keys let the attacker poison two internal op-geth RPC nodes feeding the LayerZero Labs DVN, then DDoS external RPCs to force failover onto them, producing a valid attestation for a nonexistent source-chain burn. The application's 1-of-1 DVN config made that single attestation sufficient. KelpDAO never published a full root-cause post-mortem, so I used its \"Additional Context\" X thread.\n- **Pattern:** Cross-chain message validation failure from a single-verifier trust assumption plus off-chain RPC compromise, with a short pseudocode sketch of the hash-only verification.\n- **Check:** (1) destination-vs-source cross-chain invariant monitoring (`released_on_dest <= burned_on_src`, nonce monotonicity) plus banteg's reproducible `eth_getLogs` proof-of-non-existence scan; (2) a deploy-gating config test asserting at least two independently operated DVNs.\n\nPrimary sources led the writing (LayerZero's incident report PDF, KelpDAO's own statement), backed by Chainalysis, BlockSec, QuillAudits, Credshields, rekt.news, banteg's on-chain investigation, and a migalabs forensic paper. I noted plainly that no standalone SlowMist or CertiK technical post-mortem was found, and that CertiK/Cyvers figures came second-hand.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":5286912,"inputTokens":647653,"model":"deepseek-v4-1-flash","outputTokens":38186,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":102,"wallClockMs":568409}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5964,"hash":"70477844ea8c8426a10339600a93bf52e409f540a62effdf7a63a3b7e786bcd7","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/cetus/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"7ce44d9c73b2e554","findings":[],"hash":"cc7126de545e9381f8e6d82b43b43e8ffc43aa5909a9a104ab36dace9c0c2516","nodeId":"68d4c648-5301-4c07-8f87-b023c069c523","outcome":"completed","summary":"Done. The deliverable is at `artifacts/goal/items/cetus/result.md` (5,964 bytes, under the 6,000 limit), and `git status` shows no changes outside `artifacts/goal/items/cetus/`.\n\n**What I found and wrote**\n\nCetus Protocol, Sui's largest DEX, was drained on May 22, 2025. The root cause was a math bug in the shared `@cetuspackages/inter-mate` library: `math_u256::checked_shlw` used the wrong overflow bound (`0xffffffffffffffff << 192` instead of `1 << 192`), so for large inputs the 64-bit left shift wrapped mod 2^256. In `get_delta_a` the wrapped numerator collapsed, `div_round` rounded to 1, and one unit of token A minted a pool-sized liquidity position. It was a smart-contract bug, not a key compromise. The same function was copy-pasted into Kriya, FlowX and Turbos.\n\nAmounts disagree across sources, so I gave each with its citation: ~$223M (rekt.news, Halborn, QuillAudits), over $260M (Verichains' framing), over $230M (SlowMist). Each fact carries its URL, and the sections cover what happened, root cause, the overflow pattern with an illustrative (non-working) shape, and three concrete pre-deploy checks tied to this incident.\n\n**Sources used** (each fetched and read): Cetus's own relaunch/recovery post and Q2 2025 report; Verichains' two analyses; SlowMist's analysis; Halborn's and QuillAudits' write-ups; rekt.news; and the actual fix commit.\n\n**One limitation stated in the note:** no dedicated Cetus post-mortem article exists that I could find; their own reporting is the recovery post and the Q2 report, which I cite. Medium pages returned 403 to direct fetches, so a few were retrieved through the Wayback Machine, a text-extraction proxy, or their RSS/sitemap.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":9017088,"inputTokens":940598,"model":"deepseek-v4-1-flash","outputTokens":62048,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":154,"wallClockMs":939184}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5673,"hash":"71265f0a34c19aa1e6bb331ebc88d666db5494d7ab615d8c9bd4df562e67e535","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/sir-trading/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"6960837f8e61d811","findings":[],"hash":"ce6e3271dc0c0a6a505bbcae6bc384020e4bf083569fd9be23c8c2deb481d4d7","nodeId":"a77d8d0f-3373-4c50-a80a-43220d4f0992","outcome":"completed","summary":"Created [result.md](artifacts/goal/items/sir-trading/result.md) with the project retrospective, security analyses, source discrepancies, and specific predeployment checks.\n\nValidated all five sections and the size: 5,673 bytes.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":280192,"inputTokens":46405,"model":null,"outputTokens":2496,"runtime":"codex","turns":4,"wallClockMs":92424}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5997,"hash":"55ddc3ae83802845531fe4015f8a6aeef854ce495ce80fea3ee2d8f71aef449d","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/yearn-yeth/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"c0f94d5c3d395bef","findings":[],"hash":"d8d5b64053bdc8c06dc9d9f55b4acf72cc270e3dcab5693aae2f1ed460d23f8e","nodeId":"4e679ebe-0081-41e9-82e5-58a9bea23ab1","outcome":"completed","summary":"Done. The deliverable is written and verified.\n\n**Result:** `artifacts/goal/items/yearn-yeth/result.md` (5997 bytes, under the 6000-byte cap).\n\nWhat it covers, all fact-checked against the sources I read:\n- **What happened** - 30 Nov 2025 on Ethereum, mainnet block 23,914,086, ~$9M total (~$8M from the yETH stableswap pool + ~$0.9M from the yETH/WETH Curve pool), LSTs plus 298.35 WETH taken, ~2.3544e56 yETH LP minted from dust, 1,000 ETH (~$3M) to Tornado Cash, 857.49 pxETH recovered. The amount disagreement is called out: early coverage said \"$3M,\" which actually matches the ETH laundered then, versus Yearn's settled ~$9M.\n- **Root cause** - stated plainly as a code flaw, not a key/signer/configuration issue: unchecked arithmetic in the `_calc_supply()` fixed-point solver (integer round-down collapsing the product term to 0, plus an `unsafe_sub` underflow), with the un-gated bootstrap path as the enabler.\n- **Pattern** - rounding/precision in an unchecked solver plus a reachable initialization path, with a minimal flaw description and pseudocode (no working attack).\n- **The check** - a solver fuzz/invariant test (Π never 0, mint bounded by deposit value) and the review/ops rules (checked math, explicit domain check, permanently gate bootstrap).\n- **Sources** - Yearn's official post-mortem, the governance thread, banteg's report, BlockSec's deep analysis, QuillAudits, rekt.news, The Block, Bitcoin.com, a16z, plus the tx/pool links.\n\nTwo notes on the research: the originally-plausible rekt.news slug `yearn-yeth-rekt` is dead (500) - the real article is `yearn-rekt3`. SlowMist's analysis URL exists but its page returned a bot-check, so I recorded the URL and said it was unreadable rather than citing content from it. Scope is clean: only the one required file under `artifacts/goal/items/yearn-yeth/`; everything else I fetched sat in `test/scratch/`.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":4996864,"inputTokens":670080,"model":"deepseek-v4-1-flash","outputTokens":42315,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":93,"wallClockMs":576573}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5873,"hash":"a61cb1457c8c60f83adcf37cb5ae7b940e49f7a43ac26f5b5b4fddfd804af2ca","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/crosscurve/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"c3f28ddd5cb10c11","findings":[],"hash":"e2cf2ee3f69f6a01836f061d213173a44404c22e772230ba9606e42a842f5c77","nodeId":"8ccfd40c-cc16-42f1-991b-f7a99711b192","outcome":"completed","summary":"Done. The deliverable is at `artifacts/goal/items/crosscurve/result.md` (5,873 bytes, under the 6000-byte cap), and nothing else was written outside the task paths.\n\nSummary of what the note says, with sourcing front to back:\n\n- **What happened:** On 1 Feb 2026 (some sources date it 31 Jan, one says 02/02) the CrossCurve \"Consensus Bridge\" was drained on Ethereum mainnet and again against PortalV2 on Arbitrum. Amounts disagree: the project's own figure is $1,441,892.31, BlockSec ~$2.8M, Defimon/CoinSpeaker near $3M. Taken mostly EYWA (999,787,453.03, the full PortalV2 balance) plus USDT, CRV, WETH, USDC, USDB and small amounts of 3CRV/2CRV/WBTC/frxUSD.\n- **Root cause:** Not key handling. ReceiverAxelar inherited Axelar GMP SDK v5.10's `AxelarExpressExecutable`, whose `expressExecute()` is public and skips `gateway.validateContractCall()`; the only guard is a fresh commandId, and `_execute()`'s \"peer\" check used attacker-controlled data. A consensus threshold of 1 (Berachain peer) let one path finalize immediately.\n- **Pattern:** cross-chain message validation / missing access control on a public execution path, with a short pseudocode sketch describing the flaw.\n- **Checks:** a unit test that a non-Gateway EOA calling `expressExecute()` reverts; an invariant/fuzz test that PortalV2 can only release value when `validateContractCall()` approved the tuple in the same tx; plus a review rule to enumerate inherited entrypoints and require threshold > 1.\n- **Sources:** 11 URLs, including MixBytes' post-mortem (the auditor report the project's memo names as definitive), the project's own X breakdown and recovery memorandum, Cantina (via Wayback), BlockSec, QuillAudits, KuCoin, The Block and CoinSpeaker/Yahoo.\n\nBoth primary and secondary sourcing is cited inline; where sources conflict on date and amount, all values are given. I noted plainly that no separate project-authored technical post-mortem exists.\n\nOne caveat worth flagging: several key sources (Medium-hosted QuillAudits/Olympix write-ups, The Block, Cantina's live page, the MixBytes `reports/crosscurve` listing) were partly or wholly behind bot defenses. I recovered Cantina through the Wayback Machine and read MixBytes' analysis from the archived Cantina excerpt; the MixBytes X post-mortem was fetched directly. Where a specific host was unreachable I did not invent its contents.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":11417088,"inputTokens":1210568,"model":"deepseek-v4-1-flash","outputTokens":80729,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":165,"wallClockMs":1127540}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5227,"hash":"205de7cf816308864f951ceebfc001ddd7a5000ca5be04055bd7c8a843407a54","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/cork/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"7d4a49a940f788b7","findings":[],"hash":"e3a20d14fe2dd44f91b94942806a8ca59100702d883f5d13aa07e011d6fdeec8","nodeId":"2e08f411-26a8-49c9-8083-bd4b5c9ff04f","outcome":"completed","summary":"The file is 5,227 bytes, well within the 6,000-byte limit. Every claim is sourced: Cork's own post-mortem gives us the date, chain, amount in wstETH and the full technical root cause; rekt.news provides the $12M round figure and quotes from Dedaub and BlockSec; DeFiLlama's historical API confirms the wstETH price that yields $11.9M. No standalone analyses from BlockSec, Certora, SlowMist, Halborn, Verichains, or QuillAudits were found beyond what rekt.news quotes -- this is noted at the end.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":2861056,"inputTokens":98083,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":25007,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":18,"wallClockMs":607263}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":4763,"hash":"fe837437ac7d77ae2b4a277f9678e7295bf4758f00c2f27e5b2bea5725fe39bb","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/bybit/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"45733b6bb4e97b16","findings":[],"hash":"ef988a75190f1f42cf17fdff05ff0c94e8f0ebc1bd574f34e54fe2c782756b22","nodeId":"b297d1b5-e416-4e4d-87d2-dd79a7d1b021","outcome":"completed","summary":"The file is written and looks good — all five sections are there, every claim is sourced, size is 4,763 bytes (well under 6,000). A few notes on what I read and what I couldn't reach:\n\n- **rekt.news** had two detailed articles (the main post-mortem and the Safe-focused follow-up \"Not So Safe\") that together gave the full timeline — from the initial social engineering of a Safe developer's MacBook to the Mandiant forensic report.\n- **Safe's official X post** confirmed the investigation findings and the AWS session token hijack.\n- **ByBit's official X post** and **Ben Zhou's tweets** gave the first-party account of the masked signing interface.\n- **SlowMist's X alert** was reachable but their Medium deep-dive was blocked by Cloudflare. Same for QuillAudits and CertiK blogs.\n- **Halborn** and **Verichains** blog pages returned no usable content (Verichains gave a 404, Halborn had no specific ByBit analysis page).\n\nAll sources that were reachable are cited; sources that weren't are listed at the bottom.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":581888,"inputTokens":63664,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":11459,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":3,"wallClockMs":288288}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5968,"hash":"76271cc1fa4d39075ce705467998121da6e55e408813fc00520823b039141599","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/loopscale/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"6f41bd9b44d3e708","findings":[],"hash":"eff3c572dc48a6234960e7c2b0501617518f048a9ef3b320d8cabec56bf806bb","nodeId":"21eef92d-3904-4966-8a9a-6d31f4c80203","outcome":"completed","summary":"Done. Here's what I found and delivered.\n\n## Deliverable\n`artifacts/goal/items/loopscale/result.md` — **5,968 bytes** (cap 6,000), all five required sections, left untracked (the repo's `.git/info/exclude` already covers `artifacts/`).\n\n## Key research findings\n\n**The primary source is the team's own post-mortem**, which I located via search rather than a guessed URL: `blog.loopscale.com/posts/postmortem` (8 May 2025).\n\n- **Incident:** 26 April 2025, Solana, funds bridged to Ethereum via Wormhole. Official figures: 5,726,724.97 USDC + 1,211.4 SOL ≈ **$5.8M**, ~12% of TVL (~$40M). All funds recovered; no depositor loss.\n- **Root cause (plainly a contract bug, not key handling):** RateX runs each market as its own Solana program exposing `get_pt_price`. Loopscale CPI'd into it to price RateX PT collateral. Program-ID validation existed for Exponent PTs and RateX \"Loops\" but \"failed to extend the same checks to non-Loop borrows collateralized by RateX tokens\", so an impostor program that \"spoofed the interface of a valid RateX market\" returned an inflated exchange rate and health checks passed.\n- **A strong corroborating find:** the *same shape* of bug had already been flagged pre-exploit. OShield's Jan–Feb 2025 audit (`github.com/oshieldio/Publications`) rated it critical — pricing \"lacks proper validation of the `oracle_account`\", \"just taken from the `remaining accounts`\" — and it was fixed in `get_price()`. The March 2025 RateX upgrade added a new call path where the analogous check was absent. I used this to make the §4 check specific rather than generic.\n\n**Where sources disagree**, I said so rather than picking one: CryptoNinjas and AuditOne describe a flash-loan/low-liquidity-pool price manipulation, which conflicts with the post-mortem's substituted-program account (I found no evidence for the flash-loan version). Amount framing also varies (rekt prices the haul at 39,474.5 SOL ≈ $5.792M; Halborn writes \"5.7M USDC and 1200 SOL\"). One summary lists 27 April, which is the disclosure date, not the exploit date.\n\n**What I could not find, stated as such:** no Loopscale-specific analysis from BlockSec, CertiK, SlowMist, Verichains or Neodyme. I recorded the specific failure for each — `blog.slowmist.com` refused connection, slowmist/medium returned 403, verichains/certik Loopscale URLs returned 404, `blocksec.com/blog` shows only Sept–Oct 2026 posts, DuckDuckGo and Bing served bot challenges.\n\nOne judgment call worth flagging: because the 6,000-byte cap is tight against long URLs, §5 uses citation keys `[L]`, `[R]`, etc. resolved to full URLs in the Sources section, and I verified that mapping is complete and correct.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1521664,"inputTokens":529535,"model":"deepseek-v4-1-flash","outputTokens":80868,"provider":"venice","runtime":"claude","turns":73,"wallClockMs":262547}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":4641,"hash":"d8883d3a18eea9fe99fb959046fc7cb2bcaa04a296c3b198b8f776ea39eed84a","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/drift/result.md"}],"attempt":2,"bundleHash":null,"device":"56b13350bba65fd7","findings":[],"hash":"ff4c41a5915f69d5ea615473eae831dfdedcbcf446e76cd875b7d7fc6650c9b2","nodeId":"3708637d-4913-4308-a47b-1eeb4a2908b7","outcome":"completed","summary":"","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1256960,"inputTokens":108150,"model":"deepseek-v4-pro","outputTokens":41505,"provider":"venice","runtime":"claude","turns":53,"wallClockMs":806465}},{"artifacts":[{"bytes":5891,"hash":"a489c8b55e2f7f2ac712fae44d9c9f05e52272bb92bec79194a5ca82520090da","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"result","path":"artifacts/goal/items/kiloex/result.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"6d3b3ab49d68191e","findings":[],"hash":"ff95fd3e1cee3cd55499720608404dda3e84620ecdd74ffd3d89c3d4e38c7924","nodeId":"8c0a8684-7329-40fc-b040-4dffedc927bf","outcome":"completed","summary":"Done. The deliverable is written to `artifacts/goal/items/kiloex/result.md` (5,891 bytes, under the 6,000 limit) and it's the only file under `artifacts/`.\n\n**What it covers**\n- **What happened:** multi-chain attack on Base, BSC, opBNB, Taiko (plus Manta and B2 per project timelines), executed Apr-14-2025 UTC with funding on Apr-13; reported loss range **~$7.4M–$8.4M** with each source's figure (rekt ~$7,491,500, SlowMist/Blockscope ~$8.44M, SolidityScan ~$7.4M, crypto.news ~$7M) and the day-label disagreement (Apr-14 on-chain vs. \"April 15\" headline) called out.\n- **Root cause:** a real access-control contract bug, not a key/oracle compromise — `TrustedForwarder` inherited OZ's `MinimalForwarderUpgradeable` without overriding `execute()`, and `PositionKeeper` trusted `msg.sender == trustedForwarder` instead of checking the actual signer, allowing the `TrustedForwarder → PositionKeeper → Keeper → KiloPriceFeed` chain and single-tx price manipulation.\n- **Pattern:** missing access control / unvalidated calldata in a meta-transaction flow (OWASP SC01), shown as defect-only pseudocode.\n- **Check:** a specific fuzz/invariant test (no path may reach `setPrices()` unless the origin is a whitelisted Keeper) plus the matching review rule.\n- **Sources:** the project post-mortem first, then SlowMist, SolidityScan, Blockscope, crypto.news, rekt.news, and the OZ source; the note explicitly says I found no KiloEx-specific BlockSec/Halborn/Verichains/CertiK analysis and that QuillAudits' body was bot-blocked.\n\nScope was respected: nothing outside `artifacts/goal/items/kiloex/**` was written, and scratch work stayed in the ignored `test/scratch/`.","treeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1011200,"inputTokens":316026,"model":"deepseek-v4-1-flash","outputTokens":17729,"provider":"venice","runtime":"codex","turns":36,"wallClockMs":162630}}],"verification":[{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"03e1ff6d7812fa0c3281ac17bf609677b907436ea7785308a4bd6b9eca7f254b","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"0c3f7229d6dcbb26fdaeb941c7ce6f747a3da53d2fba1be766638c5a0e872c24","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"0cb7c163c46aa207027b0988797b127c2c56b1887bb197c13d8d103a3c265e28","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"0dc55eab0db2edd9984735ac07e764eb280dfd788fb0cb992a56ab00254715e1","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"1b8498b68b630b77d96d14d5cde496e03e88419bbff166429b74c2a8194dac0c","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"1f474d01744edea1b5fd5bfb456dac3471f23b53574ba2bfa6722b2fd16dc4d8","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"2bcb4e21c84af87f5cb1d270279fa63a3ff34483fba5a63663ede1e334dfda25","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"42bf0c1f7600e8dab721cfe48dbef481c119ab62aba5ec3408062bacb3be84fd","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"5363ce985ded2f3ae125638b593798b7be61027d8c219f87836fe183c194d5eb","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"5e71970ed7f7236eb8743a7a69ba71d1865b2582c633a75cca71935a90e134f0","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"629a387d1b21630183eeb051a56117c849e3371a9072136d1103b5b4325384c1","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"6b7d91a4c4a1cc98f11cdeb37c075ad4d2ea9f64020af94400171d2ded126920","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"6dd912f05dd5fae0bad49c49d357ca1a5b16b3f7b0d3c9412831a820494c9780","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"71bf617e25622340461cf31263d1df68dca583ab17bdbd3e9386f2b5d15f4dae","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"8234b07a859997423af4ba49231e4ec0c2de082ee0f50adb93d3d279c34f3e03","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"8c748ceb9e05ee55ddc2ce20a242f56277d73cc1e3f12c40ad652144cc2bf55c","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"912dbf0c628a1a668f5ea7302d7ca4eef90b989fac07372be1f8b2d2292e65b2","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"a5195d2169a82af45ac112270a13b2e50d6c91db6dcd2ab65d3462a3ec377f9e","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"a7cec0275d457b128b2d0c5f154be4c718d97290e47e1e1a0d07143262371724","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"acf26dac8ad1705c3b1f4580342091a6fbae1c177dcb6a396d7f6d981717db2e","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"b4b1cb156f00191fc7f2f7c96c1fda4e93f478fe2add61523315bb01e8adc9f0","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"b84ec131fb1e2267ff73682af407821cc3a81835bf2615eb9fc38e0b2fdd045c","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"b8d21cf3e873123e09e4669749b870890d00c7df575a79c5d6a5dbb30b343674","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"c9e4c04a23141185bcb7b61f45f66f558e5d421e6021196107e4c5dc0db5799a","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"cc7126de545e9381f8e6d82b43b43e8ffc43aa5909a9a104ab36dace9c0c2516","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"ce6e3271dc0c0a6a505bbcae6bc384020e4bf083569fd9be23c8c2deb481d4d7","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"d8d5b64053bdc8c06dc9d9f55b4acf72cc270e3dcab5693aae2f1ed460d23f8e","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"e2cf2ee3f69f6a01836f061d213173a44404c22e772230ba9606e42a842f5c77","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"e3a20d14fe2dd44f91b94942806a8ca59100702d883f5d13aa07e011d6fdeec8","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"ef988a75190f1f42cf17fdff05ff0c94e8f0ebc1bd574f34e54fe2c782756b22","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"eff3c572dc48a6234960e7c2b0501617518f048a9ef3b320d8cabec56bf806bb","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"ff4c41a5915f69d5ea615473eae831dfdedcbcf446e76cd875b7d7fc6650c9b2","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"},{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"ff95fd3e1cee3cd55499720608404dda3e84620ecdd74ffd3d89c3d4e38c7924","verifiedTreeHash":"4b825dc642cb6eb9a060e54bf8d69288fbee4904","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+d372f99e"}]}