{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"09a98bc9-f5e4-454e-9be9-463bd0635c06","kind":"skill:research-report","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"af573174be25cbfeafcb24af0ac442047c6f8d92fa4b2fc040c8440caad28108","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":true,"profile":"none","requires":["network"],"skillHash":"3ddca93330036359dd721585e58e67820336a0398b7927b3c89369d6134f30f6","skillId":"research-report","tools":[]},"key":"research_report","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"3ddca93330036359dd721585e58e67820336a0398b7927b3c89369d6134f30f6","skillId":"research-report","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"Create an evidence-based, visually rich report identifying business opportunities in speculative crypto products.\n\nPeriod: Apr 14–Oct 14, 2026. Include older projects with significant traction during this window. Write in English; date all data snapshots.\n\nDISCOVERY\nIndependently discover 20–30 candidates across chains and select 8–10 for deep analysis. Netnet, FWA and Papertrade are starting points, not mandatory winners. Verify their identities via official sites and contracts; flag ambiguity.\n\nExplore financial games, reflexive token economies, social trading and products described as “Ponzi-like.” Do not assume this label is accurate: investigate funding sources. Include successful, declining and failed projects to avoid survivorship bias.\n\nPrioritize verified revenue, paying users, retention and sustained activity, not token capitalization or social hype alone.\n\nEVIDENCE\nUse official docs, verified contracts, explorers and independent analytics. Cite sources beside claims, with dates and metric definitions. Separate deposits/TVL, volume, user fees, protocol revenue, team income, payouts, subsidies and profit. Token appreciation, issuance, fundraising and deposit inflows are not revenue.\n\nDistinguish wallets from people and organic usage from bots, wash trading and reward farming. Label missing data and estimates; explain calculations. Separate facts, team claims and hypotheses.\n\nPER-PROJECT ANALYSIS\nCover:\n1. Product, audience, launch date, chain, official links and contracts.\n2. User journey and core rules, assets, fees, rewards and exit conditions.\n3. Cash flows: who pays whom, why, and where payouts originate.\n4. Traction and revenue trends, acquisition channels and retention loops.\n5. What worked and failed: concrete UX, economic and distribution lessons.\n6. Security, insider concentration, incentive conflicts and collapse risks.\n7. What happens when new users/deposits stop arriving.\n8. Transferable mechanics versus dependence on hype or subsidies.\n\nTOKEN ANALYSIS\nExplicitly state whether a token existed during the window and exists now. Distinguish launched, announced and rumored tokens. For tokenless projects explain monetization and incentives.\n\nFor each relevant token provide:\n- Name, ticker, chain, verified address and product relationship.\n- Launch date, method, launchpad/platform, first trading venue and initial liquidity.\n- Initial price/circulating market cap where verifiable.\n- ATH price/date; market cap and FDV at that date if historical supply is known.\n- Independently verified peak market cap/FDV and dates, which may differ from price ATH.\n- Current price, circulating market cap, FDV and circulating/total/max supply.\n- Price drawdown from ATH; market-cap change separately.\n- Trading venues, volume, liquidity and material slippage limitations.\n- Holder concentration, allocations, vesting, unlocks and emissions.\n- Implemented utility/value accrual versus promises.\n- Public evidence of team sales, migrations, exploits or delistings.\n- Whether product revenue/usage grew independently of speculation.\n\nNever confuse FDV with circulating cap or use today's supply to invent historical cap. Flag unreliable ATH prints.\n\nVISUALS\nInclude sourced screenshots, cash-flow diagrams, growth/retention diagrams and charts of revenue/activity/token performance where reliable data exists. Use Mermaid/SVG for diagrams. Label reconstructions; never fabricate screenshots or data.\n\nSYNTHESIS\nBuild comparison and token tables. Rank projects using explicit weights for verified monetization, demand/retention, sustainability, originality, implementation complexity and risk. Show confidence. Identify the strongest revenue case, most interesting mechanic and best small-team MVP.\n\nADAPTATION\nPropose 5 original business concepts: audience, need, borrowed mechanics, real revenue, costs, token versus tokenless approach, first-user acquisition, MVP and measurable validation experiment. Select the best 3.\n\nExclude deceptive payout structures and guaranteed returns. Replace dependence on new deposits with transparent product/service revenue.\n\nIMD\nCheck current IdentityMD docs. For the top 3 concepts provide supported capabilities, external dependencies, specification→prototype→tests→review→interface tasks, ready-to-use MVP prompts, acceptance criteria and critical invariants. Do not deploy or transact.\n\nOUTPUT\nExecutive summary; full report; project/token comparison tables; source log with calculations; screenshots, charts and diagrams. Save Markdown/CSV/visual files if supported. Prefer substantiated findings over breadth.\n\npresent everything in russian language","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"51317825d8b7fe9fe5187cd6bd130606d4333f804ddf35de311facdf60c64bbd","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"09a98bc9-f5e4-454e-9be9-463bd0635c06","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":null},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"52620","feedbackHash":"11be0200978b0f809e449a8aedb937993f211cf9b62a4f7b835029e54147f21d","nodeKey":"research_report","submissionHash":"af573174be25cbfeafcb24af0ac442047c6f8d92fa4b2fc040c8440caad28108","tag1":"verification:structural","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"639f8359919c5180709419d941964fb7aba98be5d0f4f7e7c0138468efe12b55","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[{"bytes":137300,"hash":"9ef4064dc2cc219bb6a0efc5249bce1de3b411d7ff940c110e5fc271d337bf35","mediaType":"text/markdown","name":"report","path":"artifacts/report.md"}],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"724dcd133729ce1a8b439c136d7484abb1aadb2ee68fe110d84b69b6984ca583","device":"3ba092738fb7852e","findings":[],"hash":"af573174be25cbfeafcb24af0ac442047c6f8d92fa4b2fc040c8440caad28108","nodeId":"8ef1d68e-b7dd-4de2-b7d8-efce1cb50a23","outcome":"completed","summary":"Готово: [отчёт на русском](artifacts/report.md) и [визуальная HTML-версия](research/report.html).\n\n25 кандидатов, 9 глубоких разборов, таблицы токенов, графики, подлинные скриншоты, 5 бизнес-концепций и 3 MVP-промпта для IdentityMD. Источники, расчёты и пробелы доказательств отмечены.\n\n95 локальных проверок пройдены; независимый аудит не проводился.","treeHash":"7499558fd9514079edbba447cd46a7e7f1854a11","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":12623232,"inputTokens":406165,"model":null,"outputTokens":70766,"runtime":"codex","turns":8,"wallClockMs":2132598}}],"verification":[{"checks":[],"detail":"paths and tree verified; no suite was run for this kind of work","evaluation":"structural","profile":"none","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"af573174be25cbfeafcb24af0ac442047c6f8d92fa4b2fc040c8440caad28108","verifiedTreeHash":"7499558fd9514079edbba447cd46a7e7f1854a11","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+67c588fa"}]}