{"assessments":[],"deployments":[],"fuzz":[],"identity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"81e8df87-989f-4d74-9391-4e1db662b19f","kind":"shape:chain","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"6599575e6cc47b2b7ecea658a6bba67803ec9502af6e339a2df1b06da2ea603b","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_economics","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"0895bc06c3c9fdce68ed264db15286154c92a49d81b00d2a1b9e375c61ee7db0","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_flow","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"a9b0b9eee28ce2ed469d72306749c0d4edfa2c7557501edc1406262f75f53855","dependsOn":["build_contract_project","write_foundry_tests","manifest","audit_math","audit_permissions","audit_economics","audit_flow"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"af3aa01159bbf354f621cafa5c0006f6169e0938a8b015be508b7377dbf165bc","skillId":"audit-judge","tools":[]},"key":"audit_judge","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"af3aa01159bbf354f621cafa5c0006f6169e0938a8b015be508b7377dbf165bc","skillId":"audit-judge","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"753e8c9b7fdc17d8966e02ed983ceb4674439c4408a8c0f14433fab2a7b412b2","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_math","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"5c496a274b88b1ea5140f5ae1f47734b46d3418d69445c42c2345ca155a98607","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","tools":[]},"key":"audit_permissions","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"e5ac2cb1fd91a56aa40b16487fc230c48de0d317c8266140331dd3219bb40a85","skillId":"audit-specialist","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"62a6df9ad0fcbb0f700789f80317f0ac191cc8f533a2242ee5fe4ba395a31dc4","dependsOn":[],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"816fe39c7efd64504a19175b0f4dd9186d61069f37a22684c90358a18c60bddc","skillId":"build-contract-project","tools":[]},"key":"build_contract_project","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"816fe39c7efd64504a19175b0f4dd9186d61069f37a22684c90358a18c60bddc","skillId":"build-contract-project","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"1c52a9c95537a27e50deab90a3e770403c8c05322f2fa1a95997bac616154a67","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"tools":[]},"key":"manifest","kind":"code","role":"integrate","skillHash":null,"skillId":null,"state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"da52179620f7eda926bb04f427eb99da0ea317f96b0366d54751a529f8d8b982","dependsOn":["build_contract_project"],"execution":{"network":false,"profile":"foundry","requires":[],"skillHash":"ab3f8f2aa4e7f3b3ada558c0dcf522ba733ca3df3b1da92c707a0fe305816d5f","skillId":"write-foundry-tests","tools":[]},"key":"write_foundry_tests","kind":"code","role":"tests","skillHash":"ab3f8f2aa4e7f3b3ada558c0dcf522ba733ca3df3b1da92c707a0fe305816d5f","skillId":"write-foundry-tests","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"A custom token: SeerIMD (SEER).\nToken name: SeerIMD\nToken symbol: SEER\nToken supply: 1,000,000,000 with 18 decimals, all minted once to the deployer in the constructor.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"7398e1483a76261969eb58225b114732a2031e882c509f6eb79e6f395b6a142d","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":"81e8df87-989f-4d74-9391-4e1db662b19f","publication":{"commit":null,"deliveredAt":null,"repoUrl":"https://github.com/identity-md-launches/launch-2536-seerimd"},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[{"agentId":"53938","feedbackHash":"dc97e5f297d9f5f2881ad63c6da10ee1b74eb63e0ef98733632f8f5c12fbba4a","nodeKey":"audit_economics","submissionHash":"6599575e6cc47b2b7ecea658a6bba67803ec9502af6e339a2df1b06da2ea603b","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51476","feedbackHash":"6e485f8b58ed10322849652ee09d7f13ada3e402bc5ab0ada3c167947f03e3a7","nodeKey":"audit_flow","submissionHash":"0895bc06c3c9fdce68ed264db15286154c92a49d81b00d2a1b9e375c61ee7db0","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52145","feedbackHash":"5c79913ddf728f9cfecc43972c2e07603cee8820e44c486b82f7e0f0e70a3489","nodeKey":"audit_judge","submissionHash":"a9b0b9eee28ce2ed469d72306749c0d4edfa2c7557501edc1406262f75f53855","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"53911","feedbackHash":"fc7bf21809e87390e6ff966f225e832d9ff08e6df8ab7edaeab856f136c72b28","nodeKey":"audit_math","submissionHash":"753e8c9b7fdc17d8966e02ed983ceb4674439c4408a8c0f14433fab2a7b412b2","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"52231","feedbackHash":"cc4dd69ac4641f8dca283b7c0bc25ec87a4e25207bc7fb54b91279267caec2b8","nodeKey":"audit_permissions","submissionHash":"5c496a274b88b1ea5140f5ae1f47734b46d3418d69445c42c2345ca155a98607","tag1":"review:submission","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"50999","feedbackHash":"bea8631515725291b8f3407f45ee9f8da10db37b1384121caf9ca5fe03ed68c6","nodeKey":"build_contract_project","submissionHash":"62a6df9ad0fcbb0f700789f80317f0ac191cc8f533a2242ee5fe4ba395a31dc4","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51289","feedbackHash":"44e7250d09558040777149553cedb2a96c6d2c7fa68e92f78195710605662926","nodeKey":"manifest","submissionHash":"1c52a9c95537a27e50deab90a3e770403c8c05322f2fa1a95997bac616154a67","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1},{"agentId":"51724","feedbackHash":"86dfd2d510a4bf5d66dc9d94f3f06154a542686a0755fb0e46a14360d064621e","nodeKey":"write_foundry_tests","submissionHash":"da52179620f7eda926bb04f427eb99da0ea317f96b0366d54751a529f8d8b982","tag1":"verification:checks","tag2":"acceptance-v2","value":1}],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"1f446a64b93d08061d79395120a220256549dff1e575778393c5a886acffdab9","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"e9049e5b12ba53ba","findings":[],"hash":"0895bc06c3c9fdce68ed264db15286154c92a49d81b00d2a1b9e375c61ee7db0","nodeId":"fbabf7e9-068c-4c55-9d31-655183927117","outcome":"completed","summary":"I found no defects in SeerIMD. `.imd-findings.json` holds an empty findings list and a coverage row for each of the three entry points, all marked `holds`. No other file was changed.\n\n**What I checked (Execution Trace, Periphery, First Principles):**\n- **The contract:** `src/SeerIMD.sol` is a standard OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 ERC-20 with nothing changed. Its constructor takes no arguments and mints 10^27 units (1 billion SEER) to `msg.sender`. Its only functions are the standard ERC-20 ones plus the `INITIAL_SUPPLY` constant. There is no owner, mint, burn, pause, blacklist, fee or upgrade path.\n- **`transfer` and `transferFrom`:** with no fee or burn, every launch transfer delivers its full amount: factory to distributor, distributor to claimant, seeding the pool, and swaps. `transferFrom` deducts the allowance before moving tokens, all in one call. Spending more than the allowance or balance reverts, and an allowance of `type(uint256).max` never decreases.\n- **`approve`:** it replaces the allowance and reverts for a zero spender or owner.\n- **Forbidden opcodes:** I compiled the contract and scanned its 1,815-byte runtime code with the same reachability rule the launch checks use. It has no reachable DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE or SELFDESTRUCT.\n- **Vendored library:** two OpenZeppelin files (`ERC20.sol`, `draft-IERC6093.sol`) don't match the hashes in `dependencies.lock.json`. I downloaded the upstream v5.4.0 archive, whose hash does match the lock, and compared them. The only differences are line-wrapping, so the compiled behaviour is unchanged. I recorded this as a coverage note, not a finding.\n- **Static analysis:** Aderyn flagged a \"large numeric literal\" at line 11. That value is the supply, and it is correct (10^27), so it is not a defect. Slither reported nothing.\n\nThe project's own suite passed: 35 tests, including the invariant runs. I could not run the protected launch tests here, because they need v4-core, the launch's `src/` helper contracts and the deployer's environment variables, none of which are in this tree. A clean result here doesn't prove the contract has no defects.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":288102,"inputTokens":14,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","outputTokens":3971,"runtime":"claude","turns":7,"wallClockMs":54088}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"c062c377f24692ac45581276830f060725f2e6b40bed66e4e29e53bbdc9002da","device":"45cc2d87b10190c7","findings":[],"hash":"1c52a9c95537a27e50deab90a3e770403c8c05322f2fa1a95997bac616154a67","nodeId":"f3511b30-eb99-47ea-879e-8d87d92601a5","outcome":"completed","summary":"Created [launch.json](/home/imd/.identitymd/work/81e8df87-989f-4d74-9391-4e1db662b19f/f3511b30-eb99-47ea-879e-8d87d92601a5/launch.json) with the exact supply, empty constructor arguments, and required pool and economics values.\n\n`forge build` succeeded. All 35 tests passed with the supplied fuzz seed. Only `launch.json` changed outside permitted scratch files.","treeHash":"d4fa86a199158d6aa868660896cce179c2aaeff8","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":262784,"inputTokens":23946,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":3022,"runtime":"codex","turns":3,"wallClockMs":90323}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"4f2ce49dc630c86e","findings":[],"hash":"5c496a274b88b1ea5140f5ae1f47734b46d3418d69445c42c2345ca155a98607","nodeId":"9e7bb06d-cee8-48e3-bdf3-248ba988c49c","outcome":"completed","summary":"I found no defects in the permissions review of SeerIMD, so `.imd-findings.json` holds an empty findings list. It also has a coverage row for each of the three entry points, all marked `holds`, plus two rows for invariants I checked. No other files were changed.\n\n**What the code is:** `src/SeerIMD.sol` is a plain OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 ERC20. Its constructor mints 1,000,000,000 × 10^18 (1e27) once to `msg.sender`, which is the factory during a launch. It adds no owner and no mint, burn, pause, blacklist or fee logic. The compiled ABI shows only the standard ERC-20 functions plus the `INITIAL_SUPPLY` constant.\n\n**Access Control:** No role exists after deployment, and the constructor gives none out. In `approve`, a caller can only set their own allowance. `transfer` only takes from the caller. `transferFrom` checks the spender's allowance before moving anything, and an unlimited (max) allowance is never reduced, which is standard OpenZeppelin behaviour. I read the vendored `ERC20.sol` function bodies and found nothing changed from upstream v5.4.0.\n\n**Trust Gap:** The token makes no privileged assumptions. Nothing can freeze, seize or move a holder's balance, and the supply cannot grow after launch, because `_mint` is only reachable from the constructor.\n\n**Asymmetry:** No address is treated differently. The launch's own transfers (factory to distributor, the pool seed, swaps through the PoolManager, distributor claims) arrive in full, since nothing is taken on transfer.\n\n**Static analysis:** The one aderyn lead, a large number literal at `src/SeerIMD.sol:11`, is not a defect. It is the intended supply constant of 1e27.\n\n**Tests:** All 35 existing tests pass, including the invariant suite. I did not run the protected floor tests. They need launch files (`src/LaunchLiquidity.sol` and others) that this project doesn't contain, so the verifier runs them.\n\nThere were only three entry points, so I covered all of them.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":236095,"inputTokens":14,"model":"claude-opus-5-5","outputTokens":2827,"runtime":"claude","turns":7,"wallClockMs":61352}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"6719645a9e1253f8665554e916731e7074fc0d879d5e4530fdb2fddb0fa9ec85","device":"59b51c92352647b4","findings":[],"hash":"62a6df9ad0fcbb0f700789f80317f0ac191cc8f533a2242ee5fe4ba395a31dc4","nodeId":"684e1bb8-580b-40ef-a4fb-739176bad17d","outcome":"completed","summary":"Implemented SeerIMD (SEER): 1 billion tokens, 18 decimals, minted once to the deployer, with no admin powers.\n\nIncluded vendored dependencies, success/failure and invariant tests, and deployment documentation.\n\nPassed:\n- `forge build`, including a fresh offline build\n- `forge test`: 35 passed with the supplied fuzz seed\n- `forge fmt --check`\n\nIdentityMD’s external launch harness remains for the verifier.","treeHash":"ec0033464e7159b1ed5de4f4f0416cb69b7e97d9","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":601728,"inputTokens":58394,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":17778,"runtime":"codex","turns":5,"wallClockMs":513115}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"01695e9524859621","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"README.md (lines 47-48) states that dependencies.lock.json 'records the exact release archives and SHA-256 checksums of the vendored files', and line 29-30 states the token inherits the 'unmodified' OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 ERC20. The recorded hashes for contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol (line 11) and contracts/interfaces/draft-IERC6093.sol (line 10) are the hashes of the upstream v5.4.0 files, but the files actually vendored under lib/openzeppelin-contracts/ were reformatted (forge fmt reflowed the `_approve(address,address,uint256,bool)` signature at ERC20.sol:273 and the `ERC1155InsufficientBalance` error at draft-IERC6093.sol:121 across several lines). I diffed both vendored files against upstream v5.4.0: the only differences are whitespace/line breaks, so compiled behavior is identical and no token guarantee in my area (supply conservation, exact launch flows, fixed supply) is affected. The defect is that the repository's own integrity record is false: anyone who follows the README and verifies the vendored tree against the lock sees two mismatches and cannot distinguish this benign reflow from a substantive edit to the ERC20 implementation. The other four pinned OpenZeppelin files and the forge-std entries I spot-checked match. Fix: either re-vendor the two files byte-for-byte from the v5.4.0 archive (and keep lib/** in the fmt ignore list, which foundry.toml already does), or regenerate the two checksums from the files as vendored and drop the word 'unmodified' from the README.","line":11,"path":"dependencies.lock.json","reproduction":"From the repository root run `sha256sum lib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol lib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/draft-IERC6093.sol`. Expected (per dependencies.lock.json lines 10-11 and the upstream v5.4.0 files): 9f906af4cba6e7e091dc12d45e6687e1239cf82d17678198424250fd64ab96bd and df936240c9a5d342582cbda70dd773b1c1d0e0dda3042b1c17b902ef0c36827b. Actual: 7c4bc5befe16038b35ddc75a6a7dedb806df52490001b0c86df344ddaa803a52 and 83fa22ba8feb13028817825d41c3de0c9def8cf5fbfd90368239537378984f47. `diff` against the upstream v5.4.0 file (https://github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts/blob/v5.4.0/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol) shows only line 273 reflowed into four lines; the draft-IERC6093.sol diff shows only line 121 reflowed into three lines.","severity":"low","snippet":"      \"contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol\": \"9f906af4cba6e7e091dc12d45e6687e1239cf82d17678198424250fd64ab96bd\",","title":"dependencies.lock.json records checksums that do not match the vendored OpenZeppelin files it claims to pin"}],"hash":"6599575e6cc47b2b7ecea658a6bba67803ec9502af6e339a2df1b06da2ea603b","nodeId":"b8022d1a-5a61-4a10-ac7e-675e473d17a1","outcome":"completed","summary":"Review complete. The findings file is written at the repository root and validated against the tree.\n\n**Outcome.** The SEER token is a plain OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 ERC-20 with one constructor mint of 10^27 base units to the deployer and no other state-changing surface. Every failure mode in the three assigned guides (Economic Security, Invariant, Flow Gap) was checked and holds. One low-severity defect was substantiated.\n\n**Finding (low).** The lock file `dependencies.lock.json` records upstream v5.4.0 checksums for two vendored OpenZeppelin files, but the files in `lib/` were reformatted and hash differently. The diff is whitespace only, so compiled behavior is unchanged, but the README's claim that the lock pins the vendored files byte-for-byte is false. Reproduction is a single sha256sum command with expected and actual hashes in the report.\n\n**What was verified for the coverage record**\n- All three entry points (approve, transfer, transferFrom) traced through the vendored ERC20 and exercised with fuzzing and the project's invariant suite. All hold.\n- Supply is minted once to msg.sender, stays fixed, and mint/burn selectors revert from both a stranger and the factory.\n- Launch flows (factory to distributor, claim, pool seed, buy and sell back, remainder to requester) each deliver the exact amount in a scratch test modeled on the protected harness.\n- Runtime bytecode contains no DELEGATECALL, CALLCODE or SELFDESTRUCT. No external calls, callbacks or dependencies exist, so no Flow Gap seam applies.\n- The project's own suite passed with the README's fuzz seed, and `forge fmt --check` is clean.\n\n**Not a defect, noted as trust assumptions.** The pool economics (80% of supply at a 5,000 IMD opening cap, 10% to the requester's address) come from the job and are copied verbatim. The approve front-running race is standard ERC-20 behavior and is documented in the README.\n\nThe scratch test directory was removed after use. No proof file was attached since nothing reached high or critical severity.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":977292,"inputTokens":450,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":13942,"runtime":"claude","turns":24,"wallClockMs":212973}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"0eca5d6d7ad6ddb4","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"README.md (line 47-48) states that dependencies.lock.json 'records the exact release archives and SHA-256 checksums of the vendored files', and the token inherits all of its arithmetic from the vendored lib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol. Two of the six recorded checksums do not match the files in the tree: ERC20.sol (lock line 11) and interfaces/draft-IERC6093.sol (lock line 10). The recorded values are the hashes of the upstream v5.4.0 files; the vendored copies were re-wrapped by a formatter after vendoring (ERC20.sol: the `_approve(address,address,uint256,bool)` signature split over four lines; draft-IERC6093.sol: the `ERC1155InsufficientBalance` error split over three lines). I diffed both against upstream v5.4.0 and the differences are whitespace only, so the token's balance, supply and allowance arithmetic is upstream's and this is not a math defect. It is an integrity defect: a verifier that checks the vendored library against the lock, as the README invites, gets a mismatch on the one file that holds all the arithmetic and cannot tell a formatting change from a semantic edit without re-doing the diff. Note foundry.toml already has `[fmt] ignore = [\"lib/**\"]`, so the reformat predates that setting or was done by other means. Minimal fix: either restore the two files to their byte-exact upstream content (then the lock is correct as written) or regenerate the two checksum entries to 7c4bc5befe16038b35ddc75a6a7dedb806df52490001b0c86df344ddaa803a52 (ERC20.sol) and 83fa22ba8feb13028817825d41c3de0c9def8cf5fbfd90368239537378984f47 (draft-IERC6093.sol).","line":11,"path":"dependencies.lock.json","reproduction":"From the repository root run `sha256sum lib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol lib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/draft-IERC6093.sol`. Expected (per dependencies.lock.json lines 11 and 10): 9f906af4cba6e7e091dc12d45e6687e1239cf82d17678198424250fd64ab96bd and df936240c9a5d342582cbda70dd773b1c1d0e0dda3042b1c17b902ef0c36827b. Actual: 7c4bc5befe16038b35ddc75a6a7dedb806df52490001b0c86df344ddaa803a52 and 83fa22ba8feb13028817825d41c3de0c9def8cf5fbfd90368239537378984f47. The other four OpenZeppelin entries (IERC20.sol, IERC20Metadata.sol, Context.sol, LICENSE) match. Fetching the same two paths at tag v5.4.0 from github.com/OpenZeppelin/openzeppelin-contracts gives files whose hashes equal the lock's values, and `diff -w` between those and the vendored copies is empty: the vendored files differ from upstream only in line wrapping (ERC20.sol lines 273-276, draft-IERC6093.sol lines 121-123).","severity":"low","snippet":"      \"contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol\": \"9f906af4cba6e7e091dc12d45e6687e1239cf82d17678198424250fd64ab96bd\",","title":"dependencies.lock.json records SHA-256 checksums that do not match two vendored OpenZeppelin files"}],"hash":"753e8c9b7fdc17d8966e02ed983ceb4674439c4408a8c0f14433fab2a7b412b2","nodeId":"565b1549-f6dc-44b3-9f53-6a17324301de","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete and the findings file is written and validated.\n\n**Outcome:** the SeerIMD token has no math-precision, boundary or numerical-gap defect. It is a 17-line wrapper that mints 10^27 units once and inherits every balance, supply and allowance operation from OpenZeppelin ERC20 v5.4.0 with no override. There is no division, scaling, cast, external call, payable path or bytes decoding anywhere in the token, so the three guides' failure modes have nothing to attach to.\n\n**What I checked**\n\n- Traced all three entry points through the vendored `_update`, `_approve` and `_spendAllowance`. The unchecked blocks are each preceded by the bound they rely on, self-transfers re-read storage after the debit, and the infinite-allowance sentinel is handled as documented.\n- Built and ran the project's suite with its pinned fuzz seed. All 34 unit and fuzz tests and both invariants pass with zero reverts over 8,192 handler calls.\n- Checked the aderyn large-literal lead: the constant equals the manifest supply exactly and fits uint256 with wide margin.\n- Checked the launch-flow arithmetic the protected harness performs: the 10/80/10 split of 10^27 divides with zero remainder, and the derived pool price and single-sided liquidity sit well inside Uniswap v4's bounds in either currency order.\n\n**One finding, low severity**\n\n`dependencies.lock.json` records checksums for two vendored OpenZeppelin files that do not match the tree. I fetched upstream v5.4.0 and confirmed the lock values are the upstream hashes, while the vendored ERC20.sol and draft-IERC6093.sol were re-wrapped by a formatter after vendoring. The diff ignoring whitespace is empty, so the arithmetic is upstream's. It still matters because the README invites verifying the library against the lock, and the mismatch lands on the one file holding all the math. The fix is to restore byte-exact upstream files or regenerate the two entries. The reproduction and the correct hashes are in the finding.\n\n**Coverage:** all three listed entry points are marked `holds`, plus five invariant rows covering supply conservation, launch-flow exactness, library provenance, external-boundary absence and pool-price reachability. No scratch tests were needed since no finding reached high severity, and no tracked files were changed.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":681241,"inputTokens":258,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":12272,"runtime":"claude","turns":21,"wallClockMs":176810}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"device":"e02bec63aa9dcaa5","findings":[{"citation":"resolved","description":"Merged from audit_economics and audit_math, which both reported the two OpenZeppelin mismatches; both said the forge-std entries they spot-checked matched, which is not the case. README.md lines 47-48 state that dependencies.lock.json 'records the exact release archives and SHA-256 checksums of the vendored files', and line 29 says the token inherits the 'unmodified' ERC-20 from OpenZeppelin v5.4.0. I verified: both archiveSha256 values match the codeload tarballs for OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 and forge-std v1.9.7; the lock's file list equals the set of files under lib/; every recorded filesSha256 value equals the hash of the corresponding upstream file in those archives. But 23 of the 36 vendored files were reformatted after vendoring (forge fmt style line reflows; foundry.toml's `[fmt] ignore = [\"lib/**\"]` was evidently added after the reflow): lib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol (line 273, the `_approve(address,address,uint256,bool)` signature split over four lines), lib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/draft-IERC6093.sol (line 121, `ERC1155InsufficientBalance` split over three lines), and 21 of the 29 forge-std files (StdAssertions, StdChains, StdCheats, StdConstants, StdInvariant, StdJson, StdMath, StdStorage, StdStyle, StdToml, StdUtils, Vm, console, safeconsole, and the IERC1155, IERC4626, IERC6909, IERC721, IERC7540, IERC7575, IMulticall3 interfaces). For every one of the 23, stripping all whitespace from the vendored file and from the upstream file yields identical bytes, so compiled behaviour is upstream's and no token guarantee (fixed supply of 10^27 minted to msg.sender, full-value transfers, standard allowance semantics) is affected; the three entry points approve/transfer/transferFrom are byte-for-byte OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 logic. The defect is that the repository's own integrity record is false for the one file that holds all of the token's logic (ERC20.sol) and for most of the test library: a reviewer who follows the README and checks lib/ against the lock gets 23 mismatches and cannot distinguish this benign reflow from a substantive edit without re-doing the diff against upstream. The claim 'unmodified' in the README is also literally untrue at the byte level. Minimal fix (either): (a) restore the 23 files byte-for-byte from the pinned archives, which makes the lock correct as written and keeps lib/** in the fmt ignore list so it stays correct; or (b) regenerate the 23 filesSha256 entries from the files as vendored and change 'unmodified' in README.md to 'reformatted only' or similar. Option (a) is preferable since the lock then also matches upstream.","line":11,"path":"dependencies.lock.json","reproduction":"From the repository root run: python3 -I -c \"import json,hashlib; l=json.load(open('dependencies.lock.json')); print(sum(1 for e in l for f,h in e['filesSha256'].items() if hashlib.sha256(open(e['path']+'/'+f,'rb').read()).hexdigest()!=h))\". Expected (per README.md lines 47-48): 0. Actual: 23. Specifically `sha256sum lib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol lib/openzeppelin-contracts/contracts/interfaces/draft-IERC6093.sol lib/forge-std/src/Vm.sol` gives 7c4bc5befe16038b35ddc75a6a7dedb806df52490001b0c86df344ddaa803a52, 83fa22ba8feb13028817825d41c3de0c9def8cf5fbfd90368239537378984f47 and a9c5662e24eb383d503aca247e5175c9684b97bad6a13abb8691a565dbd2aeff, while dependencies.lock.json lines 11, 10 and 41 record 9f906af4cba6e7e091dc12d45e6687e1239cf82d17678198424250fd64ab96bd, df936240c9a5d342582cbda70dd773b1c1d0e0dda3042b1c17b902ef0c36827b and 9068805b59ac1d0ea03a8fa1f15ae49c094e0c6c852a2500e0dd112f264b2cb1. Downloading the two archives named in the lock (codeload tarballs for OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 and forge-std v1.9.7) reproduces the lock's archiveSha256 values exactly, and sha256 of each upstream file equals the lock's value, so the lock records upstream and the tree holds reformatted copies. `diff` of upstream ERC20.sol against the vendored copy shows only line 273 reflowed to lines 273-276; `diff` of upstream draft-IERC6093.sol shows only line 121 reflowed to 121-123; for all 23 files, re.sub(r'\\s+','',content) of vendored and upstream are byte-identical. Build and tests are unaffected: `forge build` succeeds, `FOUNDRY_FUZZ_SEED=0x98e12f99a057fecf63f5881b85c2ab0a4f9f105da74dd8e06ffe7dc69f3ec17a forge test` passes 51/51, `forge fmt --check` passes.","severity":"low","snippet":"      \"contracts/token/ERC20/ERC20.sol\": \"9f906af4cba6e7e091dc12d45e6687e1239cf82d17678198424250fd64ab96bd\",","title":"dependencies.lock.json checksums do not match 23 of the 36 vendored files it claims to pin (2 OpenZeppelin, 21 forge-std); all differences are whitespace-only reformatting"}],"hash":"a9b0b9eee28ce2ed469d72306749c0d4edfa2c7557501edc1406262f75f53855","nodeId":"b2fc009f-13fa-4e9d-b18e-5e845a9be020","outcome":"completed","summary":"The review is complete and `.imd-findings.json` holds one merged finding plus a seven-row coverage record. No repository file was changed. Only the findings file and build artifacts are new, both ignored by git.\n\n**Outcome.** The SeerIMD token is a plain OpenZeppelin v5.4.0 ERC-20 with an argument-free constructor minting the manifest supply once to the deployer. No code defect was found. The two specialist findings describe the same root cause and reproduce, so they are merged into a single low finding, widened after I checked every locked file rather than a sample.\n\n**Finding kept, severity low.** The lock file's checksums do not match 23 of the 36 vendored files it pins. The specialists reported two OpenZeppelin files and said forge-std matched. In fact 21 forge-std files also differ. I verified against the pinned archives:\n\n- Both archive hashes in the lock match the downloaded tarballs, and every recorded file hash equals the upstream file.\n- Every one of the 23 vendored files differs from upstream only in whitespace. Stripping whitespace from each pair gives byte-identical content.\n- Compiled behavior is therefore upstream's. The defect is a false integrity record and an untrue \"unmodified\" claim in the README, not a token bug.\n\nSuggested fix is to restore the 23 files byte-for-byte from the archives, since the fmt ignore for `lib/**` already prevents a repeat.\n\n**Dropped leads.** The aderyn large-numeric-literal line is a style note. The literal evaluates to exactly the manifest supply.\n\n**Coverage.** All three entry points hold. Each is the unmodified OpenZeppelin logic with no owner, fee, pause, blacklist or exemption path, so the launch flows move full value and supply cannot grow. I also recorded rows for the constructor and fixed supply, CREATE2 deployability, the manifest's schema and values, and the static-analysis lead.\n\n**Checks run.** All passed:\n\n```\nforge build\nFOUNDRY_FUZZ_SEED=0x98e1... forge test   -> 51 passed, 0 failed\nforge fmt --check\n```","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":812896,"inputTokens":450,"model":"claude-fable-5-1","outputTokens":11623,"runtime":"claude","turns":15,"wallClockMs":322230}},{"artifacts":[],"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"99828a5ad97d72d1ec2fcdb9908f04b8cd8ef4ceecf508304ab5d649920ad772","device":"e1d2139b33ec4bd9","findings":[],"hash":"da52179620f7eda926bb04f427eb99da0ea317f96b0366d54751a529f8d8b982","nodeId":"109f864d-8024-4224-b304-717257399d3f","outcome":"completed","summary":"Added 16 edge-case and failure-path tests, plus expanded invariants covering 32,768 randomized handler calls.\n\n`forge build` and offline `forge test` pass with the required seed: 51 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped.\n\nOnly `test/` files changed. No implementation defects found.","treeHash":"16bb0dd99cfe9a282608c46a23b55a98a0f63afd","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":690816,"inputTokens":93602,"model":"gpt-6-astra","outputTokens":10215,"runtime":"codex","turns":6,"wallClockMs":360106}}],"verification":[{"checks":[{"durationMs":2105,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 27 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 1.92s\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":2741,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 34 tests for test/SeerIMD.t.sol:SeerIMDTest\n[PASS] testAllowanceCannotBeUsedByAnotherSpender() (gas: 110388)\n[PASS] testApprovalCanBeReplacedAndRevoked() (gas: 180065)\n[PASS] testApproveEmitsEventAndDoesNotMoveBalance() (gas: 93613)\n[PASS] testApproveZeroSpenderReverts() (gas: 33072)\n[PASS] testConstructorEmitsExactlyOneMint() (gas: 12509)\n[PASS] testEntireSupplyCanMove() (gas: 78354)\n[PASS] testFactoryReceivesEntireSupply() (gas: 216295)\n[PASS] testFuzzApproveSupportsAllAmounts(uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 88403, ~: 88696)\n[PASS] testFuzzConstructorCreditsImmediateDeployer(address) (runs: 1024, μ: 18181, ~: 18181)\n[PASS] testFuzzOverspendingTransferIsAtomic(uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 72235, ~: 72582)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 4548951967601042119095586456611604055082818658018926998\n\n[PASS] testFuzzTransferConservesSupply(address,uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 103380, ~: 103689)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 506730676385816674765279239\n\n[PASS] testFuzzTransferFromInsufficientAllowanceIsAtomic(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 138684, ~: 139131)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 395311228296736451042434642\n  Bound result 620892567636360021011068457\n\n[PASS] testFuzzTransferFromTracksAllowance(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 166167, ~: 168561)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 0\n\n[PASS] testHolderUsingTransferFromAlsoNeedsAllowance() (gas: 38782)\n[PASS] testInfiniteAllowanceIsNotDecreased() (gas: 219775)\n[PASS] testLaunchDistributionClaimsAndPoolTransfersAreExact() (gas: 567473)\n[PASS] testMetadataAndInitialSupply() (gas: 112699)\n[PASS] testNoMintBurnAdminOrUpgradeEntryPoints() (gas: 2127132)\n[PASS] testRejectsNativeCurrencyAndUnknownCalls() (gas: 64780)\n[PASS] testSelfTransferPreservesBalance() (gas: 54155)\n[PASS] testSelfTransferStillRequiresBalance() (gas: 36199)\n[PASS] testTransferAboveBalanceReverts() (gas: 57971)\n[PASS] testTransferEmitsEventAndDeliversExactAmount() (gas: 96242)\n[PASS] testTransferFromAboveAllowanceRevertsWithoutStateChange() (gas: 120944)\n[PASS] testTransferFromConsumesFiniteAllowanceAndEmitsTransfer() (gas: 249208)\n[PASS] testTransferFromFailureRestoresAllowanceWhenBalanceIsInsufficient() (gas: 126564)\n[PASS] testTransferFromSelfConsumesAllowanceWithoutChangingBalance() (gas: 110230)\n[PASS] testTransferFromToZeroRevertsAndRestoresAllowance() (gas: 119312)\n[PASS] testTransferFromWithoutAllowanceRevertsEvenForDeployer() (gas: 98615)\n[PASS] testTransferFromZeroSenderReverts() (gas: 44864)\n[PASS] testTransferToTokenContractIsOrdinaryTransfer() (gas: 91352)\n[PASS] testTransferToZeroRevertsEvenForZeroAmount() (gas: 66881)\n[PASS] testZeroTransferFromEmptyAccountEmitsEvent() (gas: 63157)\n[PASS] testZeroTransferFromNeedsNoAllowanceAndEmitsEvent() (gas: 68951)\nSuite result: ok. 34 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 89.09ms (404.57ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/SeerIMD.invariant.t.sol:SeerIMDInvariantTest\n[PASS]\nSeerIMDInvariantTest invariants:\n[PASS] invariantAllowancesMatchModel\n[PASS] invariantSupplyAndBalancesMatchModel\n SeerIMDInvariantTest invariants (runs: 128, calls: 8192, reverts: 0)\n\n╭----------------+-----------------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract       | Selector              | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+=====================================================================+\n| SeerIMDHandler | approve               | 1660  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+-----------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| SeerIMDHandler | rejectOverspend       | 1617  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+-----------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| SeerIMDHandler | rejectUnapprovedSpend | 1618  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+-----------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| SeerIMDHandler | transfer              | 1646  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+-----------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| SeerIMDHandler | transferFrom          | 1651  | 0       | 0        |\n╰----------------+-----------------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 1000000000000000000\n  Bound result 616041162757904291186158813\n  Bound result 374\n  Bound result 688\n  Bound result 1417\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 117300739\n  Bound result 944525281841405146704028774\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 17\n  Bound result 21\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 875\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 962\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 3638\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1000000000000000000\n  Bound result 18\n  Bound result 4\n  Bound result 6478\n  Bound result 23\n  Bound result 557\n  Bound result 5606\n  Bound result 5\n  Bound result 588022691341778972272151019\n  Bound result 6546\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 289857465482799263987063054\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 230\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 3\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 15\n  Bound result 8\n  Bound result 0\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 2.50s (2.47s CPU time)\n\nRan 2 test suites in 2.51s (2.59s CPU time): 35 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (35 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":51,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"SeerIMD.approve(address,uint256)\",\"SeerIMD.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"SeerIMD.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":5,\"LICENSE\":21,\"README.md\":128,\"dependencies.lock.json\":56,\"foundry.toml\":26,\"launch.json\":24,\"src/SeerIMD.sol\":17,\"test/SeerIMD.invariant.t.sol\":152,\"test/SeerIMD.t.sol\":506},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"1c52a9c95537a27e50deab90a3e770403c8c05322f2fa1a95997bac616154a67","verifiedTreeHash":"d4fa86a199158d6aa868660896cce179c2aaeff8","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+ad64f8c4"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":1838,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 27 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 1.72s\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":2706,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 34 tests for test/SeerIMD.t.sol:SeerIMDTest\n[PASS] testAllowanceCannotBeUsedByAnotherSpender() (gas: 110388)\n[PASS] testApprovalCanBeReplacedAndRevoked() (gas: 180065)\n[PASS] testApproveEmitsEventAndDoesNotMoveBalance() (gas: 93613)\n[PASS] testApproveZeroSpenderReverts() (gas: 33072)\n[PASS] testConstructorEmitsExactlyOneMint() (gas: 12509)\n[PASS] testEntireSupplyCanMove() (gas: 78354)\n[PASS] testFactoryReceivesEntireSupply() (gas: 216295)\n[PASS] testFuzzApproveSupportsAllAmounts(uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 88403, ~: 88696)\n[PASS] testFuzzConstructorCreditsImmediateDeployer(address) (runs: 1024, μ: 18181, ~: 18181)\n[PASS] testFuzzOverspendingTransferIsAtomic(uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 72235, ~: 72582)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 1021406639769203073119175872153466561750656302269485342787209386844911608\n\n[PASS] testFuzzTransferConservesSupply(address,uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 103380, ~: 103689)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 947126830924654280310453719\n\n[PASS] testFuzzTransferFromInsufficientAllowanceIsAtomic(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 138684, ~: 139131)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 55103\n  Bound result 55104\n\n[PASS] testFuzzTransferFromTracksAllowance(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 166167, ~: 168561)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 897830855334435582250136801\n\n[PASS] testHolderUsingTransferFromAlsoNeedsAllowance() (gas: 38782)\n[PASS] testInfiniteAllowanceIsNotDecreased() (gas: 219775)\n[PASS] testLaunchDistributionClaimsAndPoolTransfersAreExact() (gas: 567473)\n[PASS] testMetadataAndInitialSupply() (gas: 112699)\n[PASS] testNoMintBurnAdminOrUpgradeEntryPoints() (gas: 2127132)\n[PASS] testRejectsNativeCurrencyAndUnknownCalls() (gas: 64780)\n[PASS] testSelfTransferPreservesBalance() (gas: 54155)\n[PASS] testSelfTransferStillRequiresBalance() (gas: 36199)\n[PASS] testTransferAboveBalanceReverts() (gas: 57971)\n[PASS] testTransferEmitsEventAndDeliversExactAmount() (gas: 96242)\n[PASS] testTransferFromAboveAllowanceRevertsWithoutStateChange() (gas: 120944)\n[PASS] testTransferFromConsumesFiniteAllowanceAndEmitsTransfer() (gas: 249208)\n[PASS] testTransferFromFailureRestoresAllowanceWhenBalanceIsInsufficient() (gas: 126564)\n[PASS] testTransferFromSelfConsumesAllowanceWithoutChangingBalance() (gas: 110230)\n[PASS] testTransferFromToZeroRevertsAndRestoresAllowance() (gas: 119312)\n[PASS] testTransferFromWithoutAllowanceRevertsEvenForDeployer() (gas: 98615)\n[PASS] testTransferFromZeroSenderReverts() (gas: 44864)\n[PASS] testTransferToTokenContractIsOrdinaryTransfer() (gas: 91352)\n[PASS] testTransferToZeroRevertsEvenForZeroAmount() (gas: 66881)\n[PASS] testZeroTransferFromEmptyAccountEmitsEvent() (gas: 63157)\n[PASS] testZeroTransferFromNeedsNoAllowanceAndEmitsEvent() (gas: 68951)\nSuite result: ok. 34 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 65.12ms (393.30ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/SeerIMD.invariant.t.sol:SeerIMDInvariantTest\n[PASS]\nSeerIMDInvariantTest invariants:\n[PASS] invariantAllowancesMatchModel\n[PASS] invariantSupplyAndBalancesMatchModel\n SeerIMDInvariantTest invariants (runs: 128, calls: 8192, reverts: 0)\n\n╭----------------+-----------------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract       | Selector              | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+=====================================================================+\n| SeerIMDHandler | approve               | 1660  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+-----------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| SeerIMDHandler | rejectOverspend       | 1617  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+-----------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| SeerIMDHandler | rejectUnapprovedSpend | 1618  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+-----------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| SeerIMDHandler | transfer              | 1646  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+-----------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| SeerIMDHandler | transferFrom          | 1651  | 0       | 0        |\n╰----------------+-----------------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 1000000000000000000\n  Bound result 616041162757904291186158813\n  Bound result 374\n  Bound result 688\n  Bound result 1417\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 117300739\n  Bound result 944525281841405146704028774\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 17\n  Bound result 21\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 875\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 962\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 3638\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1000000000000000000\n  Bound result 18\n  Bound result 4\n  Bound result 6478\n  Bound result 23\n  Bound result 557\n  Bound result 5606\n  Bound result 5\n  Bound result 588022691341778972272151019\n  Bound result 6546\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 289857465482799263987063054\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 230\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 3\n  Bound result 1\n  Bound result 15\n  Bound result 8\n  Bound result 0\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 2.56s (2.56s CPU time)\n\nRan 2 test suites in 2.57s (2.63s CPU time): 35 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (35 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":70,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"SeerIMD.approve(address,uint256)\",\"SeerIMD.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"SeerIMD.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":5,\"LICENSE\":21,\"README.md\":128,\"dependencies.lock.json\":56,\"foundry.toml\":26,\"src/SeerIMD.sol\":17,\"test/SeerIMD.invariant.t.sol\":152,\"test/SeerIMD.t.sol\":506},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true},{"durationMs":1519,"exitCode":0,"name":"slither","output":"slither: no results at low impact or above","passed":true},{"durationMs":899,"exitCode":0,"name":"aderyn","output":"[low] large-numeric-literal at src/SeerIMD.sol:11: Large Numeric Literal","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"62a6df9ad0fcbb0f700789f80317f0ac191cc8f533a2242ee5fe4ba395a31dc4","verifiedTreeHash":"ec0033464e7159b1ed5de4f4f0416cb69b7e97d9","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+ad64f8c4"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":1932,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 28 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 1.83s\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":11536,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 16 tests for test/SeerIMD.edges.t.sol:SeerIMDEdgeTest\n[PASS] testApprovalIsScopedToItsOwner() (gas: 187596)\n[PASS] testFullSupplyDelegatedSpendExhaustsBalanceAndApproval() (gas: 192868)\n[PASS] testFuzzApprovalReplacementIsIdempotentAndIsolated(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 238137, ~: 238613)\n[PASS] testFuzzFailedSpendPreservesApprovalAndCanBeRetried(uint256,uint256,bool) (runs: 1024, μ: 294684, ~: 292963)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 20158\n  Bound result 8261\n\n[PASS] testFuzzInvalidRecipientPreservesApproval(uint256,bool) (runs: 1024, μ: 221998, ~: 222644)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 15000000000000000000\n\n[PASS] testFuzzSplitTransfersAndRoundTripHaveNoFeeOrDust(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 302710, ~: 302894)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 465184894087762858682888844\n  Bound result 301858047715842737181141350\n\n[PASS] testFuzzTwoSpendersHaveIndependentBudgets(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 349714, ~: 349956)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 362926234099426102705765761\n  Bound result 15579414576137070134827355\n\n[PASS] testInfiniteApprovalCanBeReplacedThenRevoked() (gas: 299615)\n[PASS] testInfiniteApprovalDoesNotBypassEmptyBalanceAndWorksAfterRefill() (gas: 368373)\n[PASS] testMaxMinusOneApprovalIsFinite() (gas: 200123)\n[PASS] testMaximumAmountRevertsWithInfiniteApproval() (gas: 156955)\n[PASS] testOneWeiDirectAndDelegatedRoundTrip() (gas: 189824)\n[PASS] testSelfTransferFromWithApprovalStillRequiresBalance() (gas: 176454)\n[PASS] testSpenderCannotGrantItselfAccessToAnotherOwnersBalance() (gas: 129876)\n[PASS] testZeroApprovalCannotAuthorizeZeroSpender() (gas: 48284)\n[PASS] testZeroDelegatedTransferToZeroStillReverts() (gas: 66693)\nSuite result: ok. 16 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 147.14ms (715.22ms CPU time)\n\nRan 34 tests for test/SeerIMD.t.sol:SeerIMDTest\n[PASS] testAllowanceCannotBeUsedByAnotherSpender() (gas: 110388)\n[PASS] testApprovalCanBeReplacedAndRevoked() (gas: 180065)\n[PASS] testApproveEmitsEventAndDoesNotMoveBalance() (gas: 93613)\n[PASS] testApproveZeroSpenderReverts() (gas: 33072)\n[PASS] testConstructorEmitsExactlyOneMint() (gas: 12509)\n[PASS] testEntireSupplyCanMove() (gas: 78354)\n[PASS] testFactoryReceivesEntireSupply() (gas: 216295)\n[PASS] testFuzzApproveSupportsAllAmounts(uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 88422, ~: 88696)\n[PASS] testFuzzConstructorCreditsImmediateDeployer(address) (runs: 1024, μ: 18181, ~: 18181)\n[PASS] testFuzzOverspendingTransferIsAtomic(uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 72234, ~: 72582)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 1021406639769203073119175872153466561750656302269485342787209386844911608\n\n[PASS] testFuzzTransferConservesSupply(address,uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 103382, ~: 103701)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 23328432074472251798941113\n\n[PASS] testFuzzTransferFromInsufficientAllowanceIsAtomic(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 138656, ~: 139131)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 7000000000000000000\n  Bound result 999999993000000000000013811\n\n[PASS] testFuzzTransferFromTracksAllowance(uint256,uint256) (runs: 1024, μ: 166386, ~: 168561)\nLogs:\n  Bound result 899658176585049545848461010\n\n[PASS] testHolderUsingTransferFromAlsoNeedsAllowance() (gas: 38782)\n[PASS] testInfiniteAllowanceIsNotDecreased() (gas: 219775)\n[PASS] testLaunchDistributionClaimsAndPoolTransfersAreExact() (gas: 567473)\n[PASS] testMetadataAndInitialSupply() (gas: 112699)\n[PASS] testNoMintBurnAdminOrUpgradeEntryPoints() (gas: 2127132)\n[PASS] testRejectsNativeCurrencyAndUnknownCalls() (gas: 64780)\n[PASS] testSelfTransferPreservesBalance() (gas: 54155)\n[PASS] testSelfTransferStillRequiresBalance() (gas: 36199)\n[PASS] testTransferAboveBalanceReverts() (gas: 57971)\n[PASS] testTransferEmitsEventAndDeliversExactAmount() (gas: 96242)\n[PASS] testTransferFromAboveAllowanceRevertsWithoutStateChange() (gas: 120944)\n[PASS] testTransferFromConsumesFiniteAllowanceAndEmitsTransfer() (gas: 249208)\n[PASS] testTransferFromFailureRestoresAllowanceWhenBalanceIsInsufficient() (gas: 126564)\n[PASS] testTransferFromSelfConsumesAllowanceWithoutChangingBalance() (gas: 110230)\n[PASS] testTransferFromToZeroRevertsAndRestoresAllowance() (gas: 119312)\n[PASS] testTransferFromWithoutAllowanceRevertsEvenForDeployer() (gas: 98615)\n[PASS] testTransferFromZeroSenderReverts() (gas: 44864)\n[PASS] testTransferToTokenContractIsOrdinaryTransfer() (gas: 91352)\n[PASS] testTransferToZeroRevertsEvenForZeroAmount() (gas: 66881)\n[PASS] testZeroTransferFromEmptyAccountEmitsEvent() (gas: 63157)\n[PASS] testZeroTransferFromNeedsNoAllowanceAndEmitsEvent() (gas: 68951)\nSuite result: ok. 34 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 147.22ms (780.37ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test for test/SeerIMD.invariant.t.sol:SeerIMDInvariantTest\n[PASS]\nSeerIMDInvariantTest invariants:\n[PASS] invariantAllowancesMatchModel\n[PASS] invariantMetadataNeverChanges\n[PASS] invariantSupplyAndBalancesMatchModel\n SeerIMDInvariantTest invariants (runs: 256, calls: 32768, reverts: 0)\n\n╭----------------+---------------------------------------+-------+---------+----------╮\n| Contract       | Selector                              | Calls | Reverts | Discards |\n+=====================================================================================+\n| SeerIMDHandler | approve                               | 3659  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| SeerIMDHandler | rejectInsufficientBalanceWithApproval | 3614  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| SeerIMDHandler | rejectOverspend                       | 3655  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| SeerIMDHandler | rejectUnapprovedSpend                 | 3542  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| SeerIMDHandler | rejectZeroRecipient                   | 3629  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| SeerIMDHandler | rejectZeroSpender                     | 3678  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| SeerIMDHandler | roundTrip                             | 3675  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| SeerIMDHandler | transfer                              | 3563  | 0       | 0        |\n|----------------+---------------------------------------+-------+---------+----------|\n| SeerIMDHandler | transferFrom                          | 3753  | 0       | 0        |\n╰----------------+---------------------------------------+-------+---------+----------╯\n\nLogs:\n  Bound result 100000000000000000000\n  Bound result 4\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 3\n  Bound result 19\n  Bound result 353\n  Bound result 5928\n  Bound result 19\n  Bound result 18\n  Bound result 5\n  Bound result 614137908068811741514810759\n  Bound result 804448733\n  Bound result 5000000000000000000\n  Bound result 17\n  Bound result 250000004999999999999999999\n  Bound result 377\n  Bound result 11003\n  Bound result 19\n  Bound result 9\n  Bound result 5000000000000000000\n  Bound result 19\n  Bound result 9792\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 5481\n  Bound result 13053622602703646079\n  Bound result 6\n  Bound result 1120\n  Bound result 426\n  Bound result 3\n  Bound result 2\n  Bound result 2\n  Bound result 10\n  Bound result 10\n  Bound result 9\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 175969870158904668701587337\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 8396\n  Bound result 8936\n  Bound result 16\n  Bound result 21\n  Bound result 6\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 4153\n  Bound result 18\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 11409\n  Bound result 6440\n  Bound result 7896\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 1000000000000000000\n  Bound result 4988\n  Bound result 4988\n  Bound result 15000000000000000000\n  Bound result 10000000000000000000\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 6220\n  Bound result 15\n  Bound result 3\n  Bound result 14\n  Bound result 5000000000000000000\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 4\n  Bound result 647338568602604738696456572\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 7000000000000000000\n  Bound result 27412424478040114\n  Bound result 2731\n  Bound result 6014\n  Bound result 52000403783060197136306350\n  Bound result 249999999999999999999989930\n  Bound result 13\n  Bound result 9851\n  Bound result 3718\n  Bound result 5000000000000000001\n  Bound result 7543\n  Bound result 17\n  Bound result 11\n  Bound result 7\n  Bound result 2\n  Bound result 3599\n  Bound result 7316\n  Bound result 16\n  Bound result 34\n  Bound result 0\n  Bound result 7000000000000000000\n\nSuite result: ok. 1 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 11.39s (11.38s CPU time)\n\nRan 3 test suites in 11.39s (11.68s CPU time): 51 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (51 total tests)\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":65,"exitCode":0,"name":"source-index","output":"{\"v\":1,\"entryPoints\":[\"SeerIMD.approve(address,uint256)\",\"SeerIMD.transfer(address,uint256)\",\"SeerIMD.transferFrom(address,address,uint256)\"],\"files\":{\".gitignore\":5,\"LICENSE\":21,\"README.md\":128,\"dependencies.lock.json\":56,\"foundry.toml\":26,\"src/SeerIMD.sol\":17,\"test/SeerIMD.edges.t.sol\":318,\"test/SeerIMD.invariant.t.sol\":258,\"test/SeerIMD.t.sol\":506},\"excluded\":[\"lib/\",\"node_modules/\"],\"truncated\":false}","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":"checks","profile":"foundry","status":"accepted","submissionHash":"da52179620f7eda926bb04f427eb99da0ea317f96b0366d54751a529f8d8b982","verifiedTreeHash":"16bb0dd99cfe9a282608c46a23b55a98a0f63afd","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+ad64f8c4"}]}