{"assessments":[],"deployments":[{"attestationHash":"1df15d9a727008a37d6f109cb6acd387fe8aa4f740b413e6f9b7f57231c0fc5a","chainId":1,"contracts":[],"id":"a9810cfa-14d5-4085-9c0d-05311d92e4b7","manifestHash":null,"status":"abandoned"}],"fuzz":[],"identity":null,"interpretation":"Records acceptance and evidence. Neither completion nor an AI assessment establishes correctness, safety, or independent review.","jobId":"13f742c1-b260-4bd3-8f15-7e7113e0add6","kind":"impl_tests_review","nodes":[{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"fe2df1e4024fe104ec55d3b8c60d0a971e380b037f9521f46cc9c00d6239ed70","dependsOn":[],"execution":null,"key":"impl","kind":"code","role":"implement","skillHash":"ec200b7b00dfd95609bcb195a7316e8c4f69df0a1e8187c89cfc9b38d6a7af90","skillId":"implement-contract","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"03f4d2ccdbe9d26610ba3296bdcb40bc05385396f88174d0c37a87b7ff818161","dependsOn":["impl","tests","review"],"execution":null,"key":"manifest","kind":"code","role":"integrate","skillHash":null,"skillId":null,"state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"0ec8f08203e08bc571215f61bd0e2fca7af43850d22d7b172dda7d1358fed29c","dependsOn":["impl","tests"],"execution":null,"key":"review","kind":"code","role":"review","skillHash":"3f8476cbd746dc2121a1fba57d2f687195565c3919e7a139c905ceb8e0b64e5a","skillId":"adversarial-review","state":"accepted"},{"acceptedSubmissionHash":"9cce4280d093512445eec00862dba544c23c91e8964fb4a3b91527a48293a27d","dependsOn":["impl"],"execution":null,"key":"tests","kind":"code","role":"tests","skillHash":"92e22b546b1d1a81a34d248cc5aebe81c37a8f0be5e9f9d563fa995bc9c8383b","skillId":"write-foundry-tests","state":"accepted"}],"objective":"Make the hook count swaps. Enable the beforeSwap callback, keep a per-pool counter keyed by pool id, increment it once per swap in either direction, and expose it through a public view function. Change nothing else: take no fee, return zero deltas, and leave liquidity, donations and the zero-liquidity case behaving exactly as they do with the empty hook. Keep it small — this is one counter and one getter.","parentJobId":null,"planHash":"81fed3ca8e54c8bcf555164d23fc6d8b1b08cf3b66e32286d21a28353ecb7fcb","previousHash":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","projectId":null,"publication":{"commit":"564c1c539b567348004480a1d2755b404f36d4c3","deliveredAt":"2026-08-24T02:38:28.712Z","repoUrl":"https://github.com/Identity-md/launch-23-hook"},"receiptIdentity":{"adapter":"0xde152afb7db5373f34876e1499fbd893a82dd336","chainId":1,"collection":"0x0000ec93127baa929e58e97dd0095a2bfb38ec1d","registry":"0x8004a169fb4a3325136eb29fa0ceb6d2e539a432"},"registry":"0xb6d0a187b050fa5bb0b87033a203f37becf4a775","research":[],"schema":"identitymd-work-v1","signals":[],"site":null,"snapshotHash":"f25c5b000f6a6bcefa59bb98ddb758b6b9ff4490fc7ea39ded50a3b4b3fbdccd","state":"completed","submissions":[{"artifacts":null,"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"3b1d20d2b29f0e7f34623f58dac4111d32bb8bda690a4a5459f4a9ee338b8c32","deviceKey":"0edd2bbb66d2d014fbbda834d6ccbc278847c31414f601db126e7a1269baddd9","findings":[],"hash":"03f4d2ccdbe9d26610ba3296bdcb40bc05385396f88174d0c37a87b7ff818161","nodeId":"114c8f8f-83d6-4f34-ae60-ce5a7401bf52","outcome":"completed","summary":"Done. `launch.json` is the only file added (`git status` shows just `?? launch.json`), `forge build` compiles and all 18 tests in `test/Hook.t.sol` pass.\n\n**What the manifest says**\n\n- **Description** — the hook counts swaps: `beforeSwap` only, one increment per swap per pool in either direction (exact-input and exact-output), read back via `swapCount(PoolId)`. It records explicitly that nothing else changes: no fee, zero `BeforeSwapDelta`, no fee override, no return-delta flags, and liquidity/donation/zero-liquidity paths untouched because no callback for them is enabled.\n- **Contracts** — hook `Hook` (`src/Hook.sol`, on `BaseHook`, `constructor(IPoolManager)`), token `LaunchToken` (`src/LaunchToken.sol`, ERC20).\n- **Permissions** — all 14 `Hooks.Permissions` fields, copied against `src/Hook.sol:44-60`: `beforeSwap: true`, every other field `false`. I compared them field-by-field; `test_EnablesOnlyBeforeSwapWithoutReturnDeltaPermissions` pins the same thing on-chain (`flagsOf(...) == BEFORE_SWAP_FLAG`).\n- **Pool** — the launch pool: `currency0` native ETH (address zero), `currency1` `LaunchToken`, `fee: 3000`, `tickSpacing: 60`, hooks `Hook`. Fee 3000 is correct now rather than the dynamic-fee flag, because `BaseHookTest.poolFee()` switches to `STATIC_FEE` as soon as the hook declares a flag.\n\nNo supply, ownership, allocation or price field is present anywhere in the file — the starting tick was deliberately left out on those grounds, since it is a price.\n\nOne caveat worth stating plainly: there is no launch manifest schema in this repo, its git history, or the fetched remotes (`dep0`/`dep1` carry only the `src/Hook.sol` and `test/Hook.t.sol` commits), so I could not validate against the schema mechanically. The shape above is derived from the task's own instructions — name the hook and token contracts, the declared permissions, the pool — using v4's exact `Hooks.Permissions` key names so a field-by-field comparison against `getHookPermissions` succeeds. If the network's schema fixes different key names or nesting, that is the part most likely to need adjusting; the facts it asserts are verified.","treeHash":"85d89a8c8e25ba75dd4ffa6b76816669157a6ad4","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":1113163,"inputTokens":48,"model":"claude-opus-5","outputTokens":12098,"runtime":"claude","turns":34,"wallClockMs":182098}},{"artifacts":null,"attempt":1,"bundleHash":null,"deviceKey":"0edd2bbb66d2d014fbbda834d6ccbc278847c31414f601db126e7a1269baddd9","findings":[{"description":"test_FailedSwapRollsBackTheIncrement (line 146), test_ZeroAmountSwapRevertsWithoutIncrementing (line 134) and the trailing assertEq in test_RejectsDirectBeforeSwapWithoutIncrementing (line 171) all follow a `vm.expectRevert` on an external call and then assert `swapCount == 0`. The external call reverts, so the EVM discards every storage write it made; the assertion restates an EVM guarantee and is independent of what _beforeSwap does. test_ZeroAmountSwapRevertsWithoutIncrementing is doubly inert: PoolManager.swap rejects `amountSpecified == 0` at PoolManager.sol:193, before `key.hooks.beforeSwap(...)` at PoolManager.sol:202, so the hook is never entered at all. Net effect: a quarter of the twelve new tests buy no coverage while reading as if they guard the counter against reverted and rejected swaps. To make them bite, the assertion has to observe state that survives the revert - e.g. do one successful swap first, then attempt the failing one and assert the count is still 1, or wrap the failing swap in a try/catch inside a single unlock so the counter can be read on the reverting path.","line":146,"path":"test/Hook.t.sol","reproduction":"Mutate src/Hook.sol:66 from `swapCount[key.toId()]++;` to `swapCount[key.toId()] += 1000;` and run `forge test`. Expected for tests named '...WithoutIncrementing' / '...RollsBackTheIncrement': failure. Actual: 14 passed, 4 failed - the four that fail are test_CountsExactInputSwapsOnceInEitherDirection ('buy counted once: 1000 != 1'), test_CountsExactOutputSwapsOnceInEitherDirection, test_DonationDoesNotIncrementTheCounterOrPayTheHook and test_ZeroLiquiditySwapKeepsZeroDeltasAndUsesItsOwnCounter, while test_FailedSwapRollsBackTheIncrement, test_ZeroAmountSwapRevertsWithoutIncrementing and test_RejectsDirectBeforeSwapWithoutIncrementing all still PASS. Separately, `forge test --match-test test_ZeroAmountSwapRevertsWithoutIncrementing -vvvv` shows the trace `PoolManager::swap(...) -> Revert SwapAmountCannotBeZero()` with no `0x4444...0080::beforeSwap` frame, proving the hook is never called.","severity":"medium","title":"Three of the four negative counter tests cannot fail for any implementation of _beforeSwap"},{"description":"The increment happens in beforeSwap, before Pool.swap runs, and is never reconciled against the resulting BalanceDelta. Any call that gets past PoolManager's `amountSpecified != 0` and `checkPoolInitialized` guards counts, even when the swap transfers nothing. The suite enshrines this rather than flagging it: test_ZeroLiquiditySwapKeepsZeroDeltasAndUsesItsOwnCounter (test/Hook.t.sol:128-131) asserts both deltas are 0 and the count is 1 in the same breath. On the live launch pool the same property makes the counter meaningless as a trading metric - anyone can drive it up for ~66k gas per unit with 1 wei of ETH. This may be the intended reading of 'increment it once per swap', but it is undocumented and nothing in the code or comments says the counter is an attempt counter rather than a trade counter.","line":66,"path":"src/Hook.sol","reproduction":"Ten calls of `swapRouter.swap{value: 1}(key, SwapParams({zeroForOne: true, amountSpecified: -1, sqrtPriceLimitX96: MIN_PRICE_LIMIT}), TestSettings({takeClaims: false, settleUsingBurn: false}), ZERO_BYTES)` against the harness pool. Expected for a counter of trades: 0 (no token changed hands). Actual: `swapCount(key.toId()) == 10`, `token.balanceOf(address(this)) == 616` - unchanged from the seeding dust, i.e. every one of the ten 'swaps' produced zero token output while moving 10 wei of ETH total. Measured gas: 661,784 for the ten calls.","severity":"low","title":"swapCount counts non-reverting swap attempts, including swaps that move zero value, so it is inflatable for gas alone"},{"description":"BaseHookTest.poolFee() (test/BaseHookTest.sol:117-119) selects DYNAMIC_FEE_FLAG when the hook declares no permissions and STATIC_FEE (3000) as soon as it declares one. Flipping `beforeSwap` to true therefore moves the harness pool from lpFee 0 to lpFee 3000, so swap pricing across the whole suite changed by 0.30% as a side effect of this commit. The template documents the switch in BaseHookTest, and the hook itself takes no fee, so this is not a hook bug - but it is the largest observable behaviour change the commit produced, it is unremarked in the new code and comments, and no test asserts the pool's effective fee. Consequently the suite cannot distinguish 'the hook takes no fee' from 'the pool's fee changed', which is exactly the property the task asks to hold. An assertion on `manager.getSlot0(key.toId()).lpFee` would pin it. BaseHookTest is a protected path, so the fix is a test plus a comment, not a harness change.","line":50,"path":"src/Hook.sol","reproduction":"Build the tree at 851023a (empty hook) and read the pool: `key.fee == 8388608` (DYNAMIC_FEE_FLAG), `getSlot0(key.toId()).lpFee == 0`, and `swap(key, true, -1 ether, ZERO_BYTES)` returns 982962843890629663540983 token wei. Build HEAD and repeat: `key.fee == 3000`, `getSlot0(key.toId()).lpFee == 3000`, and the identical 1 ETH buy returns 980016845319393782174247 token wei - 2945998571235881366736 wei less, i.e. 0.2997% worse. No test in test/Hook.t.sol observes either number.","severity":"low","title":"Enabling beforeSwap re-tiers the launch pool from 0% dynamic fee to 0.30% static, changing every swap price, and no test pins the fee"},{"description":"The header block was left untouched when the callback was enabled. Line 14 declares 'A Uniswap v4 hook with no behaviour, meant to be filled in.' and lines 16-18 state 'Every permission below is `false`, so the pool calls into this contract at no point and it behaves exactly as if no hook were attached.' Both statements are false as of line 50 (`beforeSwap: true`) and line 66 (a storage write on every swap). This is the documentation an integrator or auditor reads first, and it tells them the contract is inert, which is precisely the wrong conclusion for a contract that now mutates storage inside the swap path and adds ~22k gas to a pool's first swap. Compounding it, neither the new `swapCount` mapping (line 31) nor `_beforeSwap` (line 61) carries any NatSpec, in a file where every other member is documented.","line":14,"path":"src/Hook.sol","reproduction":"Read src/Hook.sol lines 14-18 against lines 50 and 66, or run `forge doc` / inspect the contract's NatSpec: the @notice asserts every permission is false and the pool never calls the contract, while `getHookPermissions().beforeSwap` returns true and `forge test --match-test test_FailedSwapRollsBackTheIncrement -vvvv` shows a live `0x4444...0080::beforeSwap(...)` frame inside PoolManager::swap.","severity":"low","title":"Contract NatSpec still describes the empty hook and directly contradicts the code below it"},{"description":"Hooks.beforeSwap only reads the hook's third return value when `key.fee.isDynamicFee()` (lib/uniswap-hooks/lib/v4-core/src/libraries/Hooks.sol:263). Every pool the suite builds is static-fee: the harness pool is STATIC_FEE via poolFee(), and the extra pool in test_ZeroLiquiditySwapKeepsZeroDeltasAndUsesItsOwnCounter hardcodes `fee: STATIC_FEE` (test/Hook.t.sol:119). So `parseFee` is never reached from any test that goes through PoolManager, and the 'no fee override' guarantee rests entirely on the direct-call assertion at line 76. A hook returning `LPFeeLibrary.OVERRIDE_FEE_FLAG | 500` would silently re-price every swap on a dynamic-fee pool and only that one direct-call assertion would notice. Two smaller gaps sit alongside it: nothing removes liquidity after a swap (test_LiquidityProvisionDoesNotIncrementTheCounter at line 79 is `view` and only reads the post-setUp count), and no test passes non-empty hookData, which is what real routers do. I verified all three behave correctly today - these are missing guards, not live bugs.","line":76,"path":"test/Hook.t.sol","reproduction":"Initialize a second pool with `fee: LPFeeLibrary.DYNAMIC_FEE_FLAG` and `hooks: IHooks(address(hook))`, then swap 1 ETH through it. Actual (correct, but untested by the suite): `getSlot0(dynKey.toId()).lpFee` stays 0 before and after, `swapCount(dynKey.toId()) == 1`. Likewise `modifyLiquidityRouter.modifyLiquidity(key, ModifyLiquidityParams({tickLower: tickLower, tickUpper: tickUpper, liquidityDelta: -1e6, salt: 0}), ZERO_BYTES)` after a swap leaves the count unchanged, and a swap carrying `hex\"deadbeef\"` as hookData still counts once - none of which any existing test would catch if it regressed.","severity":"low","title":"The dynamic-fee path - the only path where the hook's uint24 return value has any on-chain effect - is never exercised through the PoolManager"},{"description":"The test uses a bare `vm.expectRevert()` and calls `beforeInitialize`, whose internal `_beforeInitialize` reverts `HookNotImplemented()` unconditionally in BaseHook. The bare matcher accepts any revert data, so the test cannot tell the access-control revert apart from the not-implemented revert and would keep passing if `onlyPoolManager` were removed from that entry point. This is pre-existing template code rather than part of the swap-counter change, and the new test_RejectsDirectBeforeSwapWithoutIncrementing (line 162) already uses the correct form - `vm.expectRevert(BaseHook.NotPoolManager.selector)` - so the fix is to bring line 56 in line with it.","line":56,"path":"test/Hook.t.sol","reproduction":"Add `vm.prank(address(manager));` before the call at test/Hook.t.sol:57 and run it. Expected if the test really guarded msg.sender: the call succeeds or fails differently. Actual: it still passes, with the trace showing `beforeInitialize(...) -> Revert HookNotImplemented()` (custom error 0xf4844814) instead of `NotPoolManager()` - the same bare matcher swallows both.","severity":"info","title":"test_RejectsCallbacksFromAnyoneButThePoolManager passes for the wrong reason"}],"hash":"0ec8f08203e08bc571215f61bd0e2fca7af43850d22d7b172dda7d1358fed29c","nodeId":"e3a98be6-8f1a-4fd9-bff7-91b24af0a762","outcome":"completed","summary":"Findings written to `.imd-findings.json`. Repo files untouched (`git status --porcelain` is empty; all experiments ran in an out-of-repo scratch project at `/tmp/imd-scratch` remapped to the vendored libs).\n\n## What I checked\n\nBaseline: `forge build` + `forge test` — 18/18 pass. The implementation itself is **correct**: `key.toId()` matches `PoolManager`'s id derivation, the `(selector, ZERO_DELTA, 0)` return is inert on both static- and dynamic-fee pools, `onlyPoolManager` is inherited, and adding/removing liquidity and donations don't touch the counter (all verified by probe).\n\nThe defects are in the tests and the docs.\n\n## Findings, ranked\n\n**1. medium — three of the four negative counter tests cannot fail** (`test/Hook.t.sol:146`). `test_FailedSwapRollsBackTheIncrement`, `test_ZeroAmountSwapRevertsWithoutIncrementing`, and the trailing assert in `test_RejectsDirectBeforeSwapWithoutIncrementing` assert `swapCount == 0` after a `vm.expectRevert`'d external call — an EVM guarantee, not hook behaviour. Proved by mutation: `swapCount[key.toId()] += 1000` fails 4 tests and **all three of these still pass**. The zero-amount one is doubly inert — the `-vvvv` trace shows `PoolManager.swap` reverting at its `amountSpecified == 0` guard (`PoolManager.sol:193`) with no `beforeSwap` frame at all.\n\n**2. low — the counter counts non-reverting swap *attempts*, including zero-value ones** (`src/Hook.sol:66`). Ten `swap`s of 1 wei give `swapCount == 10` with 0 token out (~66k gas each). The suite enshrines this rather than flagging it: the zero-liquidity test asserts both deltas are 0 and the count is 1 in the same breath.\n\n**3. low — enabling the flag re-tiers the pool 0% → 0.30%, untested and unremarked** (`src/Hook.sol:50`). `BaseHookTest.poolFee()` switches from dynamic-fee to `STATIC_FEE` once any permission is set. Measured: the same 1 ETH buy returns `982962843890629663540983` before vs `980016845319393782174247` after — 0.2997% worse. The hook takes no fee, but nothing pins `slot0.lpFee`, so the suite can't distinguish the two causes.\n\n**4. low — the contract NatSpec contradicts the code** (`src/Hook.sol:14`). Still says \"no behaviour\" and \"Every permission below is `false`, so the pool calls into this contract at no point,\" directly above `beforeSwap: true` and a per-swap storage write.\n\n**5. low — the dynamic-fee path is never exercised through the PoolManager** (`test/Hook.t.sol:76`). `Hooks.sol:263` only reads the hook's `uint24` return when the pool is dynamic-fee; every pool the suite builds is static. A `OVERRIDE_FEE_FLAG | 500` regression would only be caught by the one direct-call assertion. Same for remove-liquidity and non-empty `hookData` — verified correct today, but unguarded.\n\n**6. info — `test_RejectsCallbacksFromAnyoneButThePoolManager` passes for the wrong reason** (`test/Hook.t.sol:56`, pre-existing). Bare `vm.expectRevert()` on `beforeInitialize`, which reverts `HookNotImplemented()` even when pranked as the manager — confirmed by trace. The new `test_RejectsDirectBeforeSwapWithoutIncrementing` already uses the correct selector-matched form.","treeHash":null,"usage":{"cachedInputTokens":4220708,"inputTokens":96,"model":"claude-opus-5","outputTokens":61666,"runtime":"claude","turns":60,"wallClockMs":833929}},{"artifacts":null,"attempt":1,"bundleHash":"89b74b3c212be5bbc104ac28c8e2fc47532536b67098c5f92ce39174e59490ae","deviceKey":"a1c5c6c3e93f5a311d26715fe81382674dca82117134c2e6f97c1bc5faea9f09","findings":[],"hash":"9cce4280d093512445eec00862dba544c23c91e8964fb4a3b91527a48293a27d","nodeId":"cbaf51e4-3b22-4de3-b97f-933d033eb3cd","outcome":"completed","summary":"Implemented comprehensive Foundry coverage in [test/Hook.t.sol](/root/.identitymd/work/13f742c1-b260-4bd3-8f15-7e7113e0add6/cbaf51e4-3b22-4de3-b97f-933d033eb3cd/test/Hook.t.sol:57).\n\nCoverage includes:\n\n- Exact-input and exact-output swaps in both directions\n- Per-pool counter isolation\n- Zero-liquidity behavior\n- Zero delta and fee override\n- Liquidity and donation behavior\n- Unauthorized callbacks\n- Zero-amount and post-callback failure rollback\n- No assets retained by the hook\n\nVerification:\n\n- `forge build` — passed\n- `forge test` — 18 passed, 0 failed\n- Only `test/Hook.t.sol` was modified\n- No untestable defects found; no findings file created","treeHash":"848df8bb4a827452936887dc1475cf53f6a94e8f","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":662784,"inputTokens":54401,"model":null,"outputTokens":10490,"runtime":"codex","turns":7,"wallClockMs":270493}},{"artifacts":null,"attempt":2,"bundleHash":"076c0c3df2e5b4e6d6849aafefd3e507d64b72c40cc6ccb45d7c494ed44aa0c7","deviceKey":"a1c5c6c3e93f5a311d26715fe81382674dca82117134c2e6f97c1bc5faea9f09","findings":[],"hash":"fe2df1e4024fe104ec55d3b8c60d0a971e380b037f9521f46cc9c00d6239ed70","nodeId":"f8996ff9-3cd7-4357-8688-871b503926ae","outcome":"completed","summary":"Implemented swap counting in [src/Hook.sol](/root/.identitymd/work/13f742c1-b260-4bd3-8f15-7e7113e0add6/f8996ff9-3cd7-4357-8688-871b503926ae/src/Hook.sol:31):\n\n- Enabled `beforeSwap`.\n- Added public per-`PoolId` `swapCount` getter.\n- Increments once per swap in either direction.\n- Returns zero delta and zero fee override.\n- All other callback permissions remain disabled.\n\nVerification:\n\n- `forge build`: passed.\n- `forge test`: 9 passed, including temporary bidirectional counter coverage.\n- Tracked diff contains only `src/Hook.sol`.\n- `git diff --check`: clean.","treeHash":"946cea6609e08d19f6a64b13c8b4cef8a0af77ad","usage":{"cachedInputTokens":349952,"inputTokens":34261,"model":null,"outputTokens":6153,"runtime":"codex","turns":8,"wallClockMs":159630}}],"verification":[{"checks":[{"durationMs":2309,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 93 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 2.19s\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":94,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 18 tests for test/Hook.t.sol:HookTest\n[PASS] test_BeforeSwapReturnsZeroDeltaAndNoFeeOverride() (gas: 41962)\n[PASS] test_BuyingRaisesThePrice() (gas: 247171)\n[PASS] test_BuyingWithEthReturnsToken() (gas: 184040)\n[PASS] test_CountsExactInputSwapsOnceInEitherDirection() (gas: 267380)\n[PASS] test_CountsExactOutputSwapsOnceInEitherDirection() (gas: 274394)\n[PASS] test_DeploysAtAnAddressEncodingItsPermissions() (gas: 8688)\n[PASS] test_DonationDoesNotIncrementTheCounterOrPayTheHook() (gas: 233176)\n[PASS] test_EnablesOnlyBeforeSwapWithoutReturnDeltaPermissions() (gas: 8666)\n[PASS] test_FailedSwapRollsBackTheIncrement() (gas: 89577)\n[PASS] test_IsInstalledOnThePool() (gas: 4579)\n[PASS] test_KnowsItsPoolManager() (gas: 7795)\n[PASS] test_LaunchPoolIsSeededWithoutEth() (gas: 5056)\n[PASS] test_LiquidityProvisionDoesNotIncrementTheCounter() (gas: 14423)\n[PASS] test_PoolHoldsTheEntireSupply() (gas: 16047)\n[PASS] test_RejectsCallbacksFromAnyoneButThePoolManager() (gas: 9264)\n[PASS] test_RejectsDirectBeforeSwapWithoutIncrementing() (gas: 20747)\n[PASS] test_ZeroAmountSwapRevertsWithoutIncrementing() (gas: 47555)\n[PASS] test_ZeroLiquiditySwapKeepsZeroDeltasAndUsesItsOwnCounter() (gas: 1174310)\nSuite result: ok. 18 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 3.87ms (5.03ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test suite in 4.58ms (3.87ms CPU time): 18 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (18 total tests)\n","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":null,"profile":null,"status":"accepted","submissionHash":"03f4d2ccdbe9d26610ba3296bdcb40bc05385396f88174d0c37a87b7ff818161","verifiedTreeHash":"85d89a8c8e25ba75dd4ffa6b76816669157a6ad4","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+97ef2129"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":3548,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 93 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 3.37s\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":198,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 18 tests for test/Hook.t.sol:HookTest\n[PASS] test_BeforeSwapReturnsZeroDeltaAndNoFeeOverride() (gas: 41962)\n[PASS] test_BuyingRaisesThePrice() (gas: 247171)\n[PASS] test_BuyingWithEthReturnsToken() (gas: 184040)\n[PASS] test_CountsExactInputSwapsOnceInEitherDirection() (gas: 267380)\n[PASS] test_CountsExactOutputSwapsOnceInEitherDirection() (gas: 274394)\n[PASS] test_DeploysAtAnAddressEncodingItsPermissions() (gas: 8688)\n[PASS] test_DonationDoesNotIncrementTheCounterOrPayTheHook() (gas: 233176)\n[PASS] test_EnablesOnlyBeforeSwapWithoutReturnDeltaPermissions() (gas: 8666)\n[PASS] test_FailedSwapRollsBackTheIncrement() (gas: 89577)\n[PASS] test_IsInstalledOnThePool() (gas: 4579)\n[PASS] test_KnowsItsPoolManager() (gas: 7795)\n[PASS] test_LaunchPoolIsSeededWithoutEth() (gas: 5056)\n[PASS] test_LiquidityProvisionDoesNotIncrementTheCounter() (gas: 14423)\n[PASS] test_PoolHoldsTheEntireSupply() (gas: 16047)\n[PASS] test_RejectsCallbacksFromAnyoneButThePoolManager() (gas: 9264)\n[PASS] test_RejectsDirectBeforeSwapWithoutIncrementing() (gas: 20747)\n[PASS] test_ZeroAmountSwapRevertsWithoutIncrementing() (gas: 47555)\n[PASS] test_ZeroLiquiditySwapKeepsZeroDeltasAndUsesItsOwnCounter() (gas: 1174310)\nSuite result: ok. 18 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 5.98ms (7.01ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test suite in 8.70ms (5.98ms CPU time): 18 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (18 total tests)\n","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":null,"profile":null,"status":"accepted","submissionHash":"9cce4280d093512445eec00862dba544c23c91e8964fb4a3b91527a48293a27d","verifiedTreeHash":"848df8bb4a827452936887dc1475cf53f6a94e8f","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+a58baedc"},{"checks":[{"durationMs":2803,"exitCode":0,"name":"build","output":"Compiling 93 files with Solc 0.8.26\nSolc 0.8.26 finished in 2.67s\nCompiler run successful!\n","passed":true},{"durationMs":179,"exitCode":0,"name":"test","output":"No files changed, compilation skipped\n\nRan 8 tests for test/Hook.t.sol:HookTest\n[PASS] test_BuyingRaisesThePrice() (gas: 247167)\n[PASS] test_BuyingWithEthReturnsToken() (gas: 184104)\n[PASS] test_DeploysAtAnAddressEncodingItsPermissions() (gas: 8666)\n[PASS] test_IsInstalledOnThePool() (gas: 4557)\n[PASS] test_KnowsItsPoolManager() (gas: 7751)\n[PASS] test_LaunchPoolIsSeededWithoutEth() (gas: 5077)\n[PASS] test_PoolHoldsTheEntireSupply() (gas: 16046)\n[PASS] test_RejectsCallbacksFromAnyoneButThePoolManager() (gas: 9273)\nSuite result: ok. 8 passed; 0 failed; 0 skipped; finished in 6.59ms (13.25ms CPU time)\n\nRan 1 test suite in 8.43ms (6.59ms CPU time): 8 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped (8 total tests)\n","passed":true}],"detail":"all checks passed","evaluation":null,"profile":null,"status":"accepted","submissionHash":"fe2df1e4024fe104ec55d3b8c60d0a971e380b037f9521f46cc9c00d6239ed70","verifiedTreeHash":"946cea6609e08d19f6a64b13c8b4cef8a0af77ad","verifierVersion":"0.1.0+a58baedc"}]}